Lisis
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Traducción:
- Benjamin Jowett
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~8840 palabras · 42 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAPlatón. (n.d.). Lysis [Lisis] (Benjamin Jowett, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/lysis
- MLAPlatón. Lysis [Lisis]. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/lysis.
- ChicagoPlatón. Lysis [Lisis]. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/lysis.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
Qué es un amigo, y qué hace que dos personas lo sean. Se prueban todas las combinaciones —lo semejante con lo semejante, lo contrario con lo contrario, lo que no es ni bueno ni malo— y ninguna explica la amistad.
Contexto e historia
El primer texto de la filosofía occidental dedicado entero a la amistad, y el que Aristóteles tenía delante cuando escribió los libros VIII y IX de la Ética a Nicómaco, que sí dan una respuesta. Leerlos en ese orden enseña cómo se construye una tradición.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
Have I not heard some one say, as I just now recollect, that the like is the greatest enemy of the like, the good of the good?--Yes, and he quoted the authority of Hesiod, who says: 'Potter quarrels with potter, bard with bard, Beggar with beggar;' and of all other things he affirmed, in like manner, 'That of necessity the most like are most full of envy, strife, and hatred of one another, and the most unlike, of friendship. For the poor man is compelled to be the friend of the rich, and the weak requires the aid of the strong, and the sick man of the physician; and every one who is ignorant, has to love and court him who knows.' And indeed he went on to say in grandiloquent language, that the idea of friendship existing between similars is not the truth, but the very reverse of the truth, and that the most opposed are the most friendly; for that everything desires not like but that which is most unlike: for example, the dry desires the moist, the cold the hot, the bitter the sweet, the sharp the blunt, the void the full, the full the void, and so of all other things; for the opposite is the food of the opposite, whereas like receives nothing from like. And I thought that he who said this was a charming man, and that he spoke well. What do the rest of you say? I should say, at first hearing, that he is right, said Menexenus. Then we are to say that the greatest friendship is of opposites? Exactly. Yes, Menexenus; but will not that be a monstrous answer? and will not the all-wise eristics be down upon us in triumph, and ask, fairly enough, whether love is not the very opposite of hate; and what answer shall we make to them--must we not admit that they speak the truth? We must. They will then proceed to ask whether the enemy is the friend of the friend, or the friend the friend of the enemy? Neither, he replied. Well, but is a just man the friend of the unjust, or the temperate of the intemperate, or the good of the bad?…