SigPhiSigPhi

Diccionario filosófico (VII)

Voltaire

⚠️ Aviso de contenido

Idioma:
inglés
Traducción:
William F. Fleming
Estado:
Selección u obra parcial
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~77.700 palabras · 369 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionario filosófico (VII)] (William F. Fleming, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07
  • MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionario filosófico (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
  • ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionario filosófico (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.

Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.

De qué trata

Volumen 7 de diez del Diccionario filosófico. Ignorancia – Leyes. Los artículos sobre las leyes y la justicia.

Contexto e historia

El fondo es la forma: un diccionario se consulta en lugar de leerse seguido, cosa que lo hacía imposible de refutar en bloque y fácil de hacer circular a escondidas. Voltaire lo publicó anónimo en 1764 y lo quemaron en Ginebra y en París. Nota sobre la edición: el catálogo tiene DOS ediciones del Diccionario filosófico —esta en diez volúmenes y un Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary en uno solo. No son un duplicado: son selecciones y traducciones distintas, y los artículos no se corresponden uno a uno. El original es francés.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
Perhaps, by attending a little to the progress of his life, and the nature of his character, we may discover what it was that inspired him with so strong an aversion to Christianity. The emperor Constantine, his great-uncle, who had placed the new religion on the throne, was stained by the murder of his wife, his son, his brother-in­law, his nephew, and his father-in-law. The three children of Constantine began their bloody and baleful reign, with murdering their uncle and their cousins. From that time followed a series of civil wars and murders. The father, the brother, and all the relations of Julian, and even Julian himself, were marked down for destruction by Constantius, his uncle. He escaped this general massacre, but the first years of his life were passed in exile, and he at last owed the preservation of his life, his fortune, and the title of Cæsar, only to Eusebia, the wife of his uncle Constantius, who, after having had the cruelty to proscribe his infancy, had the imprudence to appoint him Cæsar, and the still further and greater imprudence of then persecuting him. He was, in the first instance, a witness of the insolence with which a certain bishop treated his benefactress Eusebia. He was called Leontius, and was bishop of Tripoli. He sent information to the empress, "that he would not visit her unless she would consent to receive him in a manner corresponding to his episcopal dignity--that is, that she should advance to receive him at the door, that she should receive his benediction in a bending attitude, and that she should remain standing until he granted her permission to be seated." The Pagan pontiffs were not in the habit of treating princesses precisely in this manner, and such brutal arrogance could not but make a deep impression on the mind of a young man attached at once to philosophy and simplicity.

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Voltaire