Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~200.000 palabras · 952 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAWilliam James. (n.d.). The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature [Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature
- MLAWilliam James. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature [Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
- ChicagoWilliam James. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature [Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.
De qué trata
Las conferencias Gifford de James, de 1901-1902: un estudio de la conversión, la santidad, el misticismo y el alma enferma a partir de testimonios de primera mano.
Contexto e historia
El criterio de selección es lo que hace el libro. James decide mirar solo la experiencia personal —lo que le ocurre a alguien cuando está solo— y dejar de lado las instituciones, los dogmas y las iglesias; él mismo admite que es una elección que deja fuera mucho. También elige los casos extremos en vez de los corrientes, porque dice que en el caso extremo el fenómeno se ve mejor. Lo declara abiertamente, y por eso el libro puede discutirse sabiendo exactamente qué se ha incluido y qué no.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
religious feelings and religious impulses must be its subject, and I must confine myself to those more developed subjective phenomena recorded in literature produced by articulate and fully self‐conscious men, in works of piety and autobiography. Interesting as the origins and early stages of a subject always are, yet when one seeks earnestly for its full significance, one must always look to its more completely evolved and perfect forms. It follows from this that the documents that will most concern us will be those of the men who were most accomplished in the religious life and best able to give an intelligible account of their ideas and motives. These men, of course, are either comparatively modern writers, or else such earlier ones as have become religious classics. The _documents humains_ which we shall find most instructive need not then be sought for in the haunts of special erudition—they lie along the beaten highway; and this circumstance, which flows so naturally from the character of our problem, suits admirably also your lecturer’s lack of special theological learning. I may take my citations, my sentences and paragraphs of personal confession, from books that most of you at some time will have had already in your hands, and yet this will be no detriment to the value of my conclusions. It is true that some more adventurous reader and investigator, lecturing here in future, may unearth from the shelves of libraries documents that will make a more delectable and curious entertainment to listen to than mine. Yet I doubt whether he will necessarily, by his control of so much more out‐of‐the‐way material, get much closer to the essence of the matter in hand. The question, What are the religious propensities? and the question, What is their philosophic significance?…