L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Texte propre
- Étendue:
- ~1 470 mots · 7 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists
- MLAEmma Goldman. "L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.
- ChicagoEmma Goldman. L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.
De quoi il s'agit
Un dialogue de presse de jeunesse (1896) où Goldman et Johann Most défendent l'anarchisme devant le grand public.
Contexte et histoire
Une pièce de jeunesse et de vulgarisation : intéressante surtout pour la façon dont on expliquait l'anarchisme aux lecteurs d'un journal de masse, dix ans après Haymarket. Ceci est un article court, non un livre : sa taille au catalogue n'est pas un défaut de la copie. Une bonne part de l'œuvre de Goldman a pris cette forme, dans sa revue Mother Earth et dans des brochures.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
To most Americans Anarchy is an evil-sounding word -- another name for wickedness, perversity, and chaos. Anarchists are looked upon as a herd of uncombed, unwashed, and vile ruffians, bent on killing the rich and dividing their capital. Anarchy, however, to its followers actually signifies a social theory which regards the union of order with the absence of all government of man by man; in short, it means perfect individual liberty. If the meaning of Anarchy has so far been interpreted as a state of the greatest disorder, it is because people have been taught that their affairs are regulated, that they are ruled wisely, and that authority is a necessity. In by-gone centuries any person who asserted that mankind could get along without the aid of worldly and spiritual authority was considered a madman, and was either placed in a lunatic asylum or burned at the stake; whereas to-day hundreds of thousands of men and women are infidels who scorn the idea of a supernatural Being. The freethinkers of to-day, for instance, still believe in the necessity of the State, which protects society; they do not desire to know the history of our barbarian institutions. They do not understand that government did not and cannot exist without oppression; that every government has committed dark deeds and great crimes against society. The development of government has been in the order, despotism, monarchy, oligarchy, plutocracy; but it has always been a tyranny. It cannot be denied that there are a large number of wise and well-meaning people who are anxious to better the present conditions, but they have not sufficiently emancipated themselves from the prejudices and superstitions of the dark ages to understand the true inwardness of the institution called government. "How can we get along without government?" ask these people. "If our government is bad let us try to have a good one, but we must have government by all means!…
De quoi parle L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes ?Résumez L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes brièvementQuelles sont les idées clés de L'anarchie défendue par les anarchistes ?
← Retour à Emma Goldman