Réflexions sur la violence (ed. 2)
- Langue:
- anglais
- Traduction:
- T. E. Hulme
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Texte propre
- Étendue:
- ~110 000 mots · 541 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAGeorges Sorel. (n.d.). Réflexions sur la violence (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence
- MLAGeorges Sorel. "Réflexions sur la violence (ed. 2)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
- ChicagoGeorges Sorel. Réflexions sur la violence (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
De quoi il s'agit
Le livre de 1908 où Sorel défend la grève générale non comme une tactique mais comme un « mythe » : une image qui pousse les hommes à agir quand bien même elle ne se réaliserait jamais telle qu'ils se la figurent.
Contexte et histoire
C'est l'un des textes les plus gênants du corpus, et il vaut la peine de dire pourquoi. Sorel venait du marxisme et le trouvait trop rationaliste : il soutenait que les masses se meuvent non par calcul mais par images totales, et que le syndicalisme révolutionnaire devait conserver sa capacité de conflit au lieu de la négocier. Il distinguait la « violence » prolétarienne de la « force » de l'État, et méprisait la démocratie parlementaire comme un moyen d'éteindre le conflit. Ces idées furent reprises aussi bien par la gauche syndicaliste que par le fascisme italien, et Sorel lui-même sympathisa avec Lénine à la fin de sa vie. Il est au corpus parce qu'il est une pièce réelle de l'histoire des idées, et il faut le lire en sachant où il a mené.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
My dear Halevy — I should doubtless have left these studies buried in the bound volumes of a review if some friends, whose judgment I value, had not. thought that it would be a good thing to bring them before the notice of a wider public, as they serve to make better known one of the most singular social phenomena that history records. But it seemed to me that it would be necessary to give this public some additional explanations, since I cannot often expect to find judges as indulgent as you have been. When I published, in the Mouvement Socialiste, the articles which are now collected in this volume, I did not write with the intention of composing a book : I simply wrote down my reflections as they came into my mind. I knew that the subscribers to that review would have no difficulty in following me, since they were already famiHar with the theories, which for some years my friends and I had developed in its pages. But I am convinced that the readers of this book, on the contrary, will be very bewildered if I do not submit a kind of defence which will enable them to consider things from my own habitual point of view. In the course of our conversations, you have sometimes made remarks which fitted so well into the system of my own ideas that they often led me to investigate certain questions more thoroughly. I am sure that the reflections which I here submit to you, and which you have provoked, will be very useful to those who wish to read this book with profit. There are perhaps few studies in which the defects of my method of writing are more evident ; I have been frequently reproached for not respecting the rules of the art of writing, to which all our contemporaries submit, and for thus inconveniencing my readers by the disorder of my explanations. I have tried to render the text clearer by numerous corrections of detail, but I have not been able to make the disorder disappear.…