SigPhiSigPhi

Rosa Luxemburg — Stagnation et progrès du marxisme (1903)

Rosa Luxemburg

Langue:
anglais
État:
Œuvre complète
Paternité:
Écrite par l'auteur
État du texte:
Texte propre
Étendue:
~2 740 mots · 13 passages
Citer cette œuvre
  • APARosa Luxemburg. (n.d.). Rosa Luxemburg — Stagnation et progrès du marxisme (1903). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-stagnation-and-progress-of-marxism-1903
  • MLARosa Luxemburg. "Rosa Luxemburg — Stagnation et progrès du marxisme (1903)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-stagnation-and-progress-of-marxism-1903.
  • ChicagoRosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg — Stagnation et progrès du marxisme (1903). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-stagnation-and-progress-of-marxism-1903.

De quoi il s'agit

Stagnation et progrès du marxisme (1903) : pourquoi les disciples de Marx avaient si peu avancé au-delà de lui.

Contexte et histoire

La réponse de Luxemburg est gênante et vaut toujours : parce que le mouvement ne demandait à la théorie que ce dont il avait besoin au jour le jour, et que sans demande il n'y a pas de recherche. Traduction anglaise du Marxists Internet Archive. L'original est allemand — ou polonais, selon la pièce ; pour citer, l'original. Ceci est un article ou un discours de congrès, non un livre : sa taille au catalogue est la taille réelle de la pièce.

Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.

Comment cela commence
Rosa Luxemburg: Stagnation and Progress of Marxism (1903) Rosa Luxemburg Stagnation and Progress of Marxism (1903) Written: 1903. Source: Karl Marx: Man, Thinker and Revolutionist , edited by D. Ryazanov. Publisher: International Publishers, New York, 1927. Translated from German: Eden and Cedar Paul. Republished: New International, Vol. VI No. 7 (Whole No. 47), August 1940. pp. 143–144. Transcription/Markup: Dario Romeo and Brian Baggins. Proofread: Einde O’Callaghan (July 2013). Online Version: Rosa Luxemburg Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2000. In his shallow but at time interesting causerie entitled Die soziale Bewegung in Frankreich und Belgien ( The Socialist Movement in France and Belgium ), Karl Grün remarks, aptly enough, that Fourier ’s and Saint-Simon ’s theories had very different effects upon their respective adherents. Saint-Simon was the spiritual ancestor of a whole generation of brilliant investigators and writers in various field of intellectual activity; but Fourier’s followers were, with few exceptions, persons who blindly parroted their master’s words, and were incapable of making any advance upon his teaching. Grün’s explanation of this difference is that Fourier presented the world with a finished system, elaborated in all its details; whereas Saint-Simon merely tossed his disciples a loose bundle of great thoughts. Although it seems to me that Grün pays too little attention to the inner, the essential, difference between the theories of these two classical authorities in the domain of utopian socialism, I feel that on the whole is observation is sound. Beyond question, a system of ideas which is merely sketched in broad outline proves far more stimulating than a finished and symmetrical structure which leaves nothing to be added and offers no scope for the independent effort of an active mind.

Lire l'œuvre entière →

← Retour à Rosa Luxemburg