SigPhiSigPhi

動物誌

アリストテレス

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 130,000 語 · 633
この作品を引用
  • APAアリストテレス. (n.d.). 動物誌. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals
  • MLAアリストテレス. "動物誌." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
  • Chicagoアリストテレス. 動物誌. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.

何についての本か

動物について知られていたこと、および彼自身が観察したことを、アリストテレスがまとめたもの。現存する最古の動物学の書である。

背景と歴史

ここでの「誌」(historia)は探究の意であって、過去の物語ではない。数百種にわたる体の部分、習性、生殖、食性、行動が記述される。そしてこの書を際立たせているのは方法だ。アリストテレスは解剖し、比較し、分類する。自分で見ていないことについては、見ていないと言うか、誰から聞いたかを挙げる。誤りはある——多くある。漁師や牧畜者から誤った情報を得たものもある。だが、十九世紀まで再確認されなかった観察もある。タコの生殖や、ニワトリの胚が日を追って発生していく様子などだ。ダーウィンは、自分にとっての科学の神々も老アリストテレスの前では小学生にすぎない、と書いている。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
The following Translation of Aristotle's History of Animals has been made from the text of Schneider. In a work of considerable difficulty it is hardly possible entirely to avoid errors; but it is hoped that those which have escaped are neither numerous nor important. The notes of Schneider have been consulted throughout; and in places of difficulty the English translation by Taylor, the French of Camus, and the German of Strack, have been severally referred to. The work itself is the most ancient and celebrated contribution to science which has come down to us; and it is hardly possible, when we consider the means of observation which were accessible at the time, to imagine a work of more accurate observation. From the numerous quotations in which our author avails himself of the experience of his predecessors in the same field, as well as corrects their errors, there can be no doubt that Aristotle had the advantage of many works which have perished in the lapse of ages. In the Appendix to the present Translation will be found the Essay of Schneider on the sources whence Aristotle derived his knowledge of the animals he describes; and these sources, together with his own accurate observations, are probably sufficient to account for the correct knowledge of the history of animals displayed throughout the work. It is right, perhaps, to observe in this place, that Dr. Smith, in his Dictionary of Biography, speaks of the 'History of Animals' as partly the result of the royal liberality of Alexander; and doubtless Aristotle would gladly have introduced into his work any fresh materials which might have been made available to him either during his residence at the Macedonian court, or by the subsequent victories of Alexander in the East, if the information so obtained had reached Athens in sufficient time to be incorporated.…

全文を読む →

← アリストテレスに戻る