SigPhiSigPhi

青年と老年について

アリストテレス

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 2,530 語 · 12
この作品を引用
  • APAアリストテレス. (n.d.). 青年と老年について. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/on-youth-and-old-age
  • MLAアリストテレス. "青年と老年について." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/on-youth-and-old-age.
  • Chicagoアリストテレス. 青年と老年について. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/aristotle/on-youth-and-old-age.

何についての本か

若さと老いと、その間にあるもの。生命の熱と、その尽きることによって説明される。

背景と歴史

写本ではたいてい『呼吸について』『生と死について』と続けて置かれており、三篇とも同じことを扱っている。何が身体を生かしつづけ、何が尽きるのか。 『自然学小論集(パルウァ・ナトゥラリア)』の一篇。『霊魂論』の理論を、生きた身体の個々の現象に当てはめて続けた八つの小篇であり、ひとまとまりで伝わってきた。あわせて読むのがよい。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
We must now treat of youth and old age and life and death. We must probably also at the same time state the causes of respiration as well, since in some cases living and the reverse depend on this. We have elsewhere given a precise account of the soul, and while it is clear that its essential reality cannot be corporeal, yet manifestly it must exist in some bodily part which must be one of those possessing control over the members. Let us for the present set aside the other divisions or faculties of the soul (whichever of the two be the correct name). But as to being what is called an animal and a living thing, we find that in all beings endowed with both characteristics (viz. being an animal and being alive) there must be a single identical part in virtue of which they live and are called animals; for an animal qua animal cannot avoid being alive. But a thing need not, though alive, be animal, for plants live without having sensation, and it is by sensation that we distinguish animal from what is not animal. This organ, then, must be numerically one and the same and yet possess multiple and disparate aspects, for being animal and living are not identical. Since then the organs of special sensation have one common organ in which the senses when functioning must meet, and this must be situated midway between what is called before and behind (we call 'before' the direction from which sensation comes, 'behind' the opposite), further, since in all living things the body is divided into upper and lower (they all have upper and lower parts, so that this is true of plants as well), clearly the nutritive principle must be situated midway between these regions. That part where food enters we call upper, considering it by itself and not relatively to the surrounding universe, while downward is that part by which the primary excrement is discharged. Plants are the reverse of animals in this respect.…

全文を読む →

← アリストテレスに戻る