社会における個人の位置
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 5,680 語 · 27 節
この作品を引用
- APAエマ・ゴールドマン. (n.d.). The place of the individual in society [社会における個人の位置]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/emma-goldman/the-place-of-the-individual-in-society
- MLAエマ・ゴールドマン. The place of the individual in society [社会における個人の位置]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/emma-goldman/the-place-of-the-individual-in-society.
- Chicagoエマ・ゴールドマン. The place of the individual in society [社会における個人の位置]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/emma-goldman/the-place-of-the-individual-in-society.
SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。
何についての本か
同じ後期の議論の別版。個人が社会に負うもの、そして国家には負わないもの。
背景と歴史
『個人と社会と国家』と大きく重なっており、両方を並べて読むのが正しい読み方である。ゴールドマン最後の思想の二つの版なのだ。 これは本ではなく短い記事である。目録での分量は写しの欠陥ではない。ゴールドマンの仕事の多くは、自身の雑誌『マザー・アース』やパンフレットで、この形をとった。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
be sure. In practice, they still prefer the few liberties in their own respective countries. They go to Russia for a short visit or as salesmen of the “revolution,” but they feel safer and more comfortable at home. Perhaps it is not only lack of courage which keeps these good Britishers and Americans in their native lands rather than in the millenium come. Subconsciously there may lurk the feeling that individuality remains the most fundamental fact of all human association, suppressed and persecuted yet never defeated, and in the long run the victor. The “genius of man,” which is but another name for personality and individuality, bores its way through all the caverns of dogma, through the thick walls of tradition and custom, defying all taboos, setting authority at naught, facing contumely and the scaffold--ultimately to be blessed as prophet and martyr by succeeding generations. But for the “genius of man,” that inherent, persistent quality of individuality, we would be still roaming the primeval forests. Peter Kropotkin has shown what wonderful results this unique force of man’s individuality has achieved when strengthened by =co-operation= with other individualities. The one-sided and entirely inadequate Darwinian theory of the struggle for existence received its biological and sociological completion from the great Anarchist scientist and thinker. In his profound work, _Mutual Aid_, Kropotkin shows that in the animal kingdom, as well as in human society, co-operation--as opposed to internecine strife and struggle--has worked for the survival and evolution of the species. He demonstrated that only mutual aid and voluntary co-operation--=not= the omnipotent, all-devastating State--can create the basis for a free individual and associational life. At present the individual is the pawn of the zealots of dictatorship and the equally obsessed zealots of “rugged individualism.” The excuse of the former is its claim of a new objective.…