SigPhiSigPhi

Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy Volume 1 (of 3)

ヘーゲル

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
他者による記録・編纂
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト · 判読できない箇所 2 件は回答から除外しています
分量:
約 210,000 語 · 1,010
この作品を引用
  • APAヘーゲル. (n.d.). Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy Volume 1 (of 3). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/hegel-s-lectures-on-the-history-of-philosophy-volume-1-of-3
  • MLAヘーゲル. "Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy Volume 1 (of 3)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/hegel-s-lectures-on-the-history-of-philosophy-volume-1-of-3.
  • Chicagoヘーゲル. Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy Volume 1 (of 3). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/hegel-s-lectures-on-the-history-of-philosophy-volume-1-of-3.

何についての本か

哲学史講義の第一巻。方法についての序論と、初期のギリシア哲学。

背景と歴史

本文の出所を忘れずにおきたい。ヘーゲルはこれらの書物を書いていない。イェーナ、ハイデルベルク、ベルリンで幾度も行われた講義であり、彼の覚書と聴講者の筆記から、没後に編者が連続した文章へと鋳直したものである。文言が彼のものでなくとも、主張には値打ちがある。哲学史とは誤った意見の陳列室ではなく、数世紀をかけて進む一つの推論であり、いかなる体系も次の体系によって抹消されるのではなく、その内に保存される。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
THERE are various aspects under which the History of Philosophy may possess interest. We shall find the central point of this interest in the essential connection existing between what is apparently past and the present stage reached by Philosophy. That this connection is not one of the external considerations which may be taken into account in the history of Philosophy, but really expresses its inner character: that the events of this history, while they perpetuate themselves in their effects like all other events, yet produce their results in a special way—this it is which is here to be more clearly expounded. What the history of Philosophy shows us is a succession of noble minds, a gallery of heroes of thought, who, by the power of Reason, have penetrated into the being of things, of nature and of spirit, into the Being of God, and have won for us by their labours the highest treasure, the treasure of reasoned knowledge. The events and actions of this history are therefore such that personality and individual character do not enter to any large degree into its content and matter. In this respect the history of Philosophy contrasts with political history, in which the individual, according to the peculiarity of his disposition, talents, affections, the strength or weakness of his character, and in general, according to that through which he is this individual, is the subject of actions and events. In Philosophy, the less deserts and merits are accorded to the particular individual, the better is the history; and the more it deals with thought as free, with the universal character of man as man, the more this thought, which is devoid of special characteristic, is itself shown to be the producing subject.

全文を読む →

← ヘーゲルに戻る