法の哲学
- 言語:
- 英語
- 翻訳:
- S. W. Dyde
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 160,000 語 · 739 節
この作品を引用
- APAヘーゲル. (n.d.). 法の哲学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/philosophy-of-right-grundlinien-der-philosophie-des-rechts
- MLAヘーゲル. "法の哲学." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/philosophy-of-right-grundlinien-der-philosophie-des-rechts.
- Chicagoヘーゲル. 法の哲学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/philosophy-of-right-grundlinien-der-philosophie-des-rechts.
何についての本か
一八二〇年、自由がいかにして現実のものとなるかを説いた書。頭の中でではなく、所有・契約・道徳・家族・市民社会・国家においてである。
背景と歴史
叙述は抽象法——私と私のものである物件——から主観的道徳へ、さらに人倫（Sittlichkeit）へと進む。人倫においては、自由はもはや要求ではなく、制度として据えられた生き方である。市民社会を論じた箇所で、ヘーゲルは、市場を放っておけば富と窮乏とを同時に生み、みずからはそれを解きえないと述べている。マルクスが尋ねに行った場所の一つがここだ。序文には、もっとも引かれもっとも争われる二つの文がある。理性的なものと現実的なものについての一文と、ミネルヴァの梟は黄昏に飛び立つという一文である。この書にプロイセン国家の弁護を読み取った者もあれば、その逆を読み取った者もある。要約を通さずに読むだけの値打ちがある。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
makes some interesting remarks upon the “ Philosophy of Bight,” and informs us as to the ■wav m which the matter of the book had been put togethei He dates his preface May 29th, 1833, tlmteen years, lacking one month, later than Hegel’s date for the tomidetion of his own preface, and eighteen months aftei the philosopher’s death. Hegel had, it would appeal, lived to see the outbreak of unusual ojiiiosition to his political conceptions, and so Dr Hans begins ‘ The wide-spiead uiisuiiderstauding, which pievents the lecogmtion of the leal value of the present woilc, and stands in the uav of its general acceptance, urgo me, now that an enlaiged edition of it has been prepaied. to touch upon some things, which I would rathei have left simplv to me leasing philosophic msight ” He goes on to give thiee leasous foi placing gieat value upon this woik of Hegel’s 1 He thinks that the highest piaise is due to the author for the way in which he does justice to every side of the subject, even investigating questions -which hare only a shght bearing upon the matter in hand, and thus erecting a marvellouslv complete structure This fact is more striking, thinks Di Gans, than the foundation of the work, which had been aheady in a measure laid In Kant and "Rousseau 2 A second achievement of the “ Philosophy of Eight ” IB the abolition of the distinction, so prominent in the X TRANSLAIOR’S PKEFACJC, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuiies, between law and politics Even m oui own time, lemaiks the oditoi, many think of law as the skeleton, as it woic, ot the difEerent toims of the state, as an abstiact thing devoid ot life and movement Pohties, again, they conceive to be more mobile and a iimctiou ot a living thing Law is thus said to stand to politics as auatomv to 2 >hysiology This divergence, which was unknown to Plato and Aristotle, had its oiigin in the sejiaiatist clnaiactci ot the Middle Ages, and…