ヘーゲル論理学
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 160,000 語 · 738 節
この作品を引用
- APAヘーゲル. (n.d.). ヘーゲル論理学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-logic-of-hegel
- MLAヘーゲル. "ヘーゲル論理学." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-logic-of-hegel.
- Chicagoヘーゲル. ヘーゲル論理学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-logic-of-hegel.
何についての本か
ヘーゲル『エンチュクロペディー』第一部のウォレス訳。学生のために書かれた、彼の論理学の簡略版である。
背景と歴史
『大論理学』と取り違えぬこと。あちらは別の、はるかに大部の著作である。これは「小論理学」だ。番号を振った簡潔な節から成り、講義で教師が講じるために作られている。だから入口としてよく使われる。ここでの「論理学」も今日の意味ではない。妥当な推論の理論ではなく、我々がそれによって考えるところの諸範疇——有、無、成、質、量、本質、原因、概念——を吟味し、その一つ一つが押し詰められると自己と矛盾し、次のものへと導かれていく次第を追うものである。諸規定を別々に固定しようとする悟性の論理への批判があり、また有と無から成へという、この書の冒頭を飾る有名な移行がある。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
1.] PHILOSOPHY misses an advantage enjoyed by the other sciences. It cannot like them rest the existence of its objects on the natural admissions of consciousness, nor can it assume that its method of cognition, either for starting or for continuing, is one already accepted. The objects of philosophy, it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme sense in which God and God only is the Truth. Both in like manner go on to treat of the finite worlds of Nature and the human Mind, with their relation to each other and to their truth in God. Some _acquaintance_ with its objects, therefore, philosophy may and even must presume, that and a certain interest in them to boot, were it for no other reason than this: that in point of time the mind makes general _images_ of objects, long before it makes _notions_ of them, and that it is only through these mental images, and by recourse to them, that the thinking mind rises to know and comprehend _thinkingly._ But with the rise of this thinking study of things, it soon becomes evident that thought will be satisfied with nothing short of showing the _necessity_ of its facts, of demonstrating the existence of its objects, as well as their nature and qualities. Our original acquaintance with them is thus discovered to be inadequate. We can assume nothing, and assert nothing dogmatically; nor can we accept the assertions and assumptions of others. And yet we must make a beginning: and a beginning, as primary and underived, makes an assumption, or rather is an assumption. It seems as if it were impossible to make a beginning at all. 2.] This _thinking study of things_ may serve, in a general way, as a description of philosophy. But the description is too wide.…