Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica
- 言語:
- 英語
- 翻訳:
- Hugh G. Evelyn-White
- 状態:
- 単巻・収録範囲は確認中
- 著者性:
- 箇所により執筆責任者が異なる
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 100,000 語 · 479 節
Composite volume: Works and Days, Theogony, attributed Hesiodic fragments and other epic poems. The digital source supplies only the English portion and omits some notes. Not every work or paratext is by Hesiod.
- Hugh G. Evelyn-White — translator, editor, introduction, notes
- DBK (digital preparer) — digital preparation, additional notes
この作品を引用
- APAヘシオドス. (n.d.). Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica (Hugh G. Evelyn-White, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/hesiod/theogony-and-works-and-days
- MLAヘシオドス. Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica. Translated by Hugh G. Evelyn-White. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/hesiod/theogony-and-works-and-days.
- Chicagoヘシオドス. Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica. Translated by Hugh G. Evelyn-White. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/hesiod/theogony-and-works-and-days.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
Composite volume: Works and Days, Theogony, attributed Hesiodic fragments and other epic poems. The digital source supplies only the English portion and omits some notes. Not every work or paratext is by Hesiod.
背景と歴史
English portion of a composite volume, including complete poems and attributed fragments. Introductions and notes by Evelyn-White and the digital preparer are separate textual responsibilities. Greek texts and some textual notes are omitted by this digital source; complete coverage of the stored volume has not been collated.
この解説はまだ翻訳されていません。上の文章は英語の原文です。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
The early Greek epic—that is, poetry as a natural and popular, and not (as it became later) an artificial and academic literary form—passed through the usual three phases, of development, of maturity, and of decline. No fragments which can be identified as belonging to the first period survive to give us even a general idea of the history of the earliest epic, and we are therefore thrown back upon the evidence of analogy from other forms of literature and of inference from the two great epics which have come down to us. So reconstructed, the earliest period appears to us as a time of slow development in which the characteristic epic metre, diction, and structure grew up slowly from crude elements and were improved until the verge of maturity was reached. …