平等化制度について
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 7,160 語 · 34 節
この作品を引用
- APAジェレミ・ベンサム. (n.d.). Of the Levelling System [平等化制度について]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system
- MLAジェレミ・ベンサム. Of the Levelling System [平等化制度について]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
- Chicagoジェレミ・ベンサム. Of the Levelling System [平等化制度について]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『平等化の体系について』。財産を均すことについて。
背景と歴史
ベンサムは、富を再分配すれば幸福の総量は増えるかと問う。答えは二つの半分からできていて、たいてい片方だけが引かれる。増える、なぜなら同じ金は持たざる者にとってより値打ちがあるからだ。ただし、それが所有の安全を壊してしまうなら増えない。彼はその安全をほかのすべての条件と見ている。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
many thousands of pounds to lend, so many thousands more than they have need to employ otherwise. Upon the equalisation scheme, all these monied men would be no more: nobody would have any thing he could spare for any length of time, much less for ever; no man would have any thing but from hand to mouth. As to the gainers — (I speak always of the immediate and momentary gainers, for ultimately, as we shall see, there would scarcely be a real gainer left in the nation) — as to the real gainers, if they were to be looked for any where, it would be in the class of the present day-labourers in husbandry. Their employment need not be changed; they would continue labourers in husbandry, with this comfortable difference, as it would be thought, of labouring upon, and for the benefit of their own property, instead of other people's. But even these would for the most part gain nothing but ruin by the change. Their fragments of farms having no buildings on them, would be useless to them till buildings could be erected. A man might farm profitably, and live comfortably a year or two hence, if he were then alive: but in the meantime he would not be able to farm or live at all. The immense multitude of new created farms, all of them without buildings, would require an immense and instant multiplication of the number of workmen concerned in building. But this number, instead of being multiplied, or so much as increased, would be as immediately and permanently reduced: for they too would have their portions, as well as the labourers in husbandry: if they laboured any longer, it would be upon their own property, not upon other people’s. If they laboured at all, what inducement would they have to labour upon other peoples property, or indeed for other people? What would they get by it? an