SigPhiSigPhi

倫理学

ジョン・デューイ

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 220,000 語 · 1,048
この作品を引用
  • APAジョン・デューイ. (n.d.). 倫理学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/ethics
  • MLAジョン・デューイ. "倫理学." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/ethics.
  • Chicagoジョン・デューイ. 倫理学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/ethics.

何についての本か

三部構成の倫理学教科書。道徳の歴史、道徳理論、そして当時の社会的・経済的問題への適用。

背景と歴史

目録が述べていないので、ここで言っておかねばならない。この書はデューイ一人のものではない。ジェイムズ・ヘイデン・タフツとの共著であり、一九〇八年に二人の名で刊行された。分担は記録に残っており、歴史を扱う部分は主にタフツの手になる。全体をデューイに帰するのはよくある誤りで、後年の重版の扉に由来する。労働・所有・家族を論じる第三部はもっとも時代を感じさせるが、同時に、デューイの言う応用倫理学が何であったかをもっともよく示している。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
The significance of this text in Ethics lies in its effort to awaken a vital conviction of the genuine reality of moral problems and the value of reflective thought in dealing with them. To this purpose are subordinated the presentation in Part I. of historic material; the discussion in Part II. of the different types of theoretical interpretation, and the consideration, in Part III., of some typical social and economic problems which characterize the present. Experience shows that the student of morals has difficulty in getting the field objectively and definitely before him so that its problems strike him as real problems. Conduct is so intimate that it is not easy to analyze. It is so important that to a large extent the perspective for regarding it has been unconsciously fixed by early training. The historical method of approach has proved in the classroom experience of the authors an effective method of meeting these difficulties. To follow the moral life through typical epochs of its development enables students to realize what is involved in their own habitual standpoints; it also presents a concrete body of subject-matter which serves as material of analysis and discussion. The classic conceptions of moral theory are of remarkable importance in illuminating the obscure places of the moral life and in giving the student clues which will enable him to explore it for himself. But there is always danger of either dogmatism or a sense of unreality when students are introduced abruptly to the theoretical ideas. Instead of serving as tools for understanding the moral facts, the ideas are likely to become substitutes for the facts. When they are proffered ready-made, their theoretical acuteness and cleverness may be admired, but their practical soundness and applicability are suspected.…

全文を読む →

← ジョン・デューイに戻る