ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 75,600 語 · 359 節
この作品を引用
- APAジョン・デューイ. (n.d.). Leibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding A Critical Exposition [ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/leibniz-s-new-essays-concerning-the-human-understanding-a-critical-exposition
- MLAジョン・デューイ. Leibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding A Critical Exposition [ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/leibniz-s-new-essays-concerning-the-human-understanding-a-critical-exposition.
- Chicagoジョン・デューイ. Leibniz's New Essays Concerning the Human Understanding A Critical Exposition [ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/leibniz-s-new-essays-concerning-the-human-understanding-a-critical-exposition.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』の批判的解説。デューイ最初の本(一八八八年)。
背景と歴史
二十九歳のときのもので、まだ観念論の影響下にあり、プラグマティズム以前である。彼がどこから来たかを見せてくれる。我々の知っているデューイは、これと訣別することによってできた。目録には、ライプニッツが答えている相手であるロックの『人間知性論』もある。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
which the highest attainments of disrupted and disheartened Germany were comparative barbarism. Molière was still alive, and Racine was at the summit of his glory. Leibniz became acquainted with Arnaud, a disciple of Descartes, who initiated him into the motive and spirit of his master. Cartesianism as a system, with its scientific basis and its speculative consequences, thus first became to him an intellectual reality. And, perhaps most important of all, he met Huygens, who became his teacher and inspirer both in the higher forms of mathematics and in their application to the interpretation and expression of physical phenomena. His diplomatic mission took him also to London, where the growing world of mathematical science was opened yet wider to him. The name of Sir Isaac Newton need only be given to show what this meant. From this time one of the greatest glories of Leibniz's life dates,--a glory, however, which during his lifetime was embittered by envy and unappreciation, and obscured by detraction and malice,--the invention of the infinitesimal calculus. It would be interesting, were this the place, to trace the history of its discovery,--the gradual steps which led to it, the physical facts as well as mathematical theories which made it a necessity; but it must suffice to mention that these were such that the discovery of some general mode of expressing and interpreting the newly discovered facts of Nature was absolutely required for the further advance of science, and that steps towards the introduction of the fundamental ideas of the calculus had already been taken,--notably by Keppler, by Cavalieri, and by Wallis. It would be interesting to follow also the course of the controversy with Newton,--a controversy which in its method of conduct reflects no credit upon the names of either.…
この作品について質問するライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説は何についての作品ですか?ライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説を簡潔に要約してくださいライプニッツ『人間知性新論』批判的解説の重要な思想は何ですか?
← ジョン・デューイに戻る