公衆とその諸問題
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 60,000 語 · 285 節
この作品を引用
- APAジョン・デューイ. (n.d.). The public and its problems [公衆とその諸問題]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems
- MLAジョン・デューイ. The public and its problems [公衆とその諸問題]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems.
- Chicagoジョン・デューイ. The public and its problems [公衆とその諸問題]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『公衆とその諸問題』（一九二七年）。市民は十分に知らないのだから民主主義は不可能だ、と言う人々へのデューイの答え。
背景と歴史
ウォルター・リップマンとの論争であり、彼が書いた政治理論のなかで最も重要な著作である。彼の答え——公衆は自然に存在するのではなく構成されねばならず、それをするのがコミュニケーションだ——は、いまやかつてなく議論されている。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
on one hand and uncontrolled speculation on the other. The choice is between blind, unreasoned attack and defense on the one hand, and discriminating criticism employing intelligent method and a conscious criterion on the other. The prestige of the mathematical and physical sciences is great, and properly so. But the difference between facts which are what they are independent of human desire and endeavor and facts which are to some extent what they are because of human interest and purpose, and which alter with alteration in the latter, cannot be got rid of by any methodology. The more sincerely we appeal to facts, the greater is the importance of the distinction between facts which condition human activity and facts which are conditioned by human activity. In the degree which we ignore this difference, social science becomes pseudo-science. Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian political ideas are not merely theories dwelling in the human mind remote from facts of American political behavior. They are expressions of chosen phases and factors among those facts, but they are also something more: namely, forces which have shaped those facts and which are still contending to shape them in the future this way and that. There is more than a speculative difference between a theory of the state which regards it as an instrument in protecting individuals in the rights they already have, and one which conceives its function to be the effecting of a more equitable distribution of rights among individuals. For the theories are held and applied by legislators in congress and by judges on the bench and make a difference in the subsequent facts themselves. I make no doubt that the practical influence of the political philosophies of Aristotle, the Stoics, St. Thomas, Locke, Rousseau, Kant and Hegel has often been exaggerated in comparison with the influence of circumstances.…