論理学体系
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 440,000 語 · 2,094 節
この作品を引用
- APAジョン・スチュアート・ミル. (n.d.). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive [論理学体系]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/a-system-of-logic-ratiocinative-and-inductive
- MLAジョン・スチュアート・ミル. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive [論理学体系]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/a-system-of-logic-ratiocinative-and-inductive.
- Chicagoジョン・スチュアート・ミル. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive [論理学体系]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/a-system-of-logic-ratiocinative-and-inductive.
SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。
何についての本か
ミルの帰納論。個々の事例からいかにして法則に至るかを説き、今も彼の名で呼ばれる四つの実験的研究法——一致法・差異法・剰余法・共変法——を立てる。
背景と歴史
一八四三年刊。ミル最初の大著であり、その名声を築いた書でもある。第六巻すなわち最終巻は同じ要求を「道徳科学」にまで及ぼし、社会もまた科学の対象たりうると論じる。この主張が宣言ではなく論証によって支えられているのは、この書においてである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
(and the author believes that they have much need of improvement) can only consist in performing more systematically and accurately operations with which, at least in their elementary form, the human intellect, in some one or other of its employments, is already familiar. In the portion of the work which treats of Ratiocination, the author has not deemed it necessary to enter into technical details which may be obtained in so perfect a shape from the existing treatises on what is termed the Logic of the Schools. In the contempt entertained by many modern philosophers for the syllogistic art, it will be seen that he by no means participates; though the scientific theory on which its defense is usually rested appears to him erroneous: and the view which he has suggested of the nature and functions of the Syllogism may, perhaps, afford the means of conciliating the principles of the art with as much as is well grounded in the doctrines and objections of its assailants. The same abstinence from details could not be observed in the First Book, on Names and Propositions; because many useful principles and distinctions which were contained in the old Logic have been gradually omitted from the writings of its later teachers; and it appeared desirable both to revive these, and to reform and rationalize the philosophical foundation on which they stood. The earlier chapters of this preliminary Book will consequently appear, to some readers, needlessly elementary and scholastic. But those who know in what darkness the nature of our knowledge, and of the processes by which it is obtained, is often involved by a confused apprehension of the import of the different classes of Words and Assertions, will not regard these discussions as either frivolous, or irrelevant to the topics considered in the later Books.…