SigPhiSigPhi

経済学の未解決のいくつかの問題に関する試論

ジョン・スチュアート・ミル

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 52,600 語 · 250
この作品を引用
  • APAジョン・スチュアート・ミル. (n.d.). 経済学の未解決のいくつかの問題に関する試論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/essays-on-some-unsettled-questions-of-political-economy
  • MLAジョン・スチュアート・ミル. "経済学の未解決のいくつかの問題に関する試論." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/essays-on-some-unsettled-questions-of-political-economy.
  • Chicagoジョン・スチュアート・ミル. 経済学の未解決のいくつかの問題に関する試論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/john-stuart-mill/essays-on-some-unsettled-questions-of-political-economy.

何についての本か

二十五歳で書き、十五年後に発表された経済学の五つの論考。

背景と歴史

大事なのは方法についての第五論文である。名高い「経済人」——富を最大化する存在としてのみ捉えられた人間——がここで導入され、ミルはそれが誰かの記述ではなく**役に立つ虚構**だとはっきり言っている。後にそれが別のものとして受け取られたのは、彼の責任ではない。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
Of these Essays, which were written in 1829 and 1830, the fifth alone has been previously printed. The other four have hitherto remained in manuscript, because, during the temporary suspension of public interest in the species of discussion to which they belong, there was no inducement to their publication. They are now published (with a few merely verbal alterations) under the impression, that the controversies excited by Colonel Torrens' _Budget_ have again called the attention of political economists to the discussions of the abstract science: and from the additional consideration, that the first paper relates expressly to the point upon which the question at issue between Colonel Torrens and his antagonists has principally turned. From that paper it will be seen that opinions identical in principle with those promulgated by Colonel Torrens (there would probably be considerable difference as to the extent of their practical application) have been held by the writer for more than fifteen years: although he cannot claim to himself the original conception, but only the elaboration, of the fundamental doctrine of the Essay. A prejudice appears to exist in many quarters against the theory in question, on the supposition of its being opposed to one of the most valuable results of modern political philosophy, the doctrine of Freedom of Trade between nation and nation. The opinions now laid before the reader are presented as corollaries necessarily following from the principles upon which Free Trade itself rests. The writer has also been careful to point out, that from these opinions no justification can be derived for any _protecting_ duty, or other preference given to domestic over foreign industry.…

全文を読む →

← ジョン・スチュアート・ミルに戻る