経済学批判
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト · 判読できない箇所 1 件は回答から除外しています
- 分量:
- 約 89,700 語 · 426 節
この作品を引用
- APAカール・マルクス. (n.d.). 経済学批判. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy
- MLAカール・マルクス. "経済学批判." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
- Chicagoカール・マルクス. 経済学批判. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
何についての本か
『経済学批判』(一八五九年)。『資本論』に先立つ本。
背景と歴史
その序言は、『宣言』を除けばマルクスで最も多く引かれる文章である。史的唯物論の定式——「人間の意識が存在を規定するのではなく、逆である」——と、土台と上部構造の像がそこにある。六ページが一世紀分の論争を組み立てた。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
_Capital_, _landed property_, _wage labor_; _state_, _foreign trade_, _world market_. Under the first three heads I examine the conditions of the economic existence of the three great classes, which make up modern bourgeois society; the connection of the three remaining heads is self evident. The first part of the first book, treating of capital, consists of the following chapters: 1. Commodity; 2. Money, or simple circulation; 3. Capital in general. The first two chapters form the contents of the present work. The entire material lies before me in the form of monographs, written at long intervals not for publication, but for the purpose of clearing up those questions to myself, and their systematic elaboration on the plan outlined above will depend upon circumstances. I omit a general introduction which I had prepared, as on second thought any anticipation of results that are still to be proven, seemed to me objectionable, and the reader who wishes to follow me at all, must make up his mind to pass from the special to the general. On the other hand, some remarks as to the course of my own politico-economic studies may be in place here. The subject of my professional studies was jurisprudence, which I pursued, however, in connection with and as secondary to the studies of philosophy and history. In 1842-43, as editor of the “Rheinische Zeitung,” I found myself embarrassed at first when I had to take part in discussions concerning so-called material interests. The proceedings of the Rhine Diet in connection with forest thefts and the extreme subdivision of landed property; the official controversy about the condition of the Mosel peasants into which Herr von Schaper, at that time president of the Rhine Province, entered with the “Rheinische Zeitung;” finally, the debates on free trade and protection, gave me the first impulse to take up the study of…