経済学批判
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャン誤りあり (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません) · 判読できない箇所 1 件は回答から除外しています
- 分量:
- 約 89,700 語 · 426 節
この作品を引用
- APAカール・マルクス. (n.d.). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy [経済学批判]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy
- MLAカール・マルクス. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy [経済学批判]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
- Chicagoカール・マルクス. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy [経済学批判]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『経済学批判』（一八五九年）。『資本論』に先立つ本。
背景と歴史
その序言は、『宣言』を除けばマルクスで最も多く引かれる文章である。史的唯物論の定式——「人間の意識が存在を規定するのではなく、逆である」——と、土台と上部構造の像がそこにある。六ページが一世紀分の論争を組み立てた。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
same quantity of labor-time. Inasmuch as these two products represent equal quantities of universal labor-time and, hence, are equivalents of _every_ use-value which contains the same amount of labor-time, they are also equivalent to each other. Only because the labor-time of the spinner and that of the weaver take the form of universal labor-time and their products appear as universal equivalents, is the labor of the weaver realized for the spinner, and that of the spinner, for the weaver, the labor of one takes the place of the labor of the other, i. e., the social character of their labors is realized for both. Quite different it was under the patriarchal system of production, when spinner and weaver lived under the same roof, when the female members of the family did the spinning, and the male members did the weaving to supply the wants of their own family; then yarn and linen were _social_ products, spinning and weaving were _social_ labor within the limits of the family. But their social character did not manifest itself in the fact that yarn, as a universal equivalent, could be exchanged for linen as a universal equivalent, or that one was exchanged for another, as identical and equivalent expressions of the same universal labor-time. It was rather the family organization with its natural division of labor that impressed its peculiar social stamp on the product of labor. Or, let us take the services and payments in kind of the Middle Ages. It was the specific kind of labor performed by each individual in its natural form, the particular and not the universal aspect of labor, that constituted then the social tie. Or, let us finally take labor carried on in common in its primitive natural form, as we find it at the dawn of history of all civilized races.…