SigPhiSigPhi

パンの略取

ピョートル・クロポトキン

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 78,500 語 · 373
この作品を引用
  • APAピョートル・クロポトキン. (n.d.). パンの略取. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread
  • MLAピョートル・クロポトキン. "パンの略取." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread.
  • Chicagoピョートル・クロポトキン. パンの略取. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread.

何についての本か

『パンの略取』(一八九二年)。革命の翌日、人はどうやって食べるのか。

背景と歴史

クロポトキンは原理を論じない。計算する。パンはどれだけ要るか、家はいくつ、労働は何時間か。主張は、万人の福祉はすでに現にある技術で可能であり、問題は分配だ、というものである。これまでに書かれたアナキズムの本のなかで最も実際的である。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
One of the current objections to Communism, and Socialism altogether, is that the idea is so old, and yet it has never been realized. Schemes of ideal States haunted the thinkers of Ancient Greece; later on, the early Christians joined in communist groups; centuries later, large communist brotherhoods came into existence during the Reform movement. Then, the same ideals were revived during the great English and French Revolutions; and finally, quite lately, in 1848, a revolution, inspired to a great extent with Socialist ideals, took place in France. "And yet, you see," we are told, "how far away is still the realization of your schemes. Don't you think that there is some fundamental error in your understanding of human nature and its needs?" At first sight this objection seems very serious. However, the moment we consider human history more attentively, it loses its strength. We see, first, that hundreds of millions of men have succeeded in maintaining amongst themselves, in their village communities, for many hundreds of years, one of the main elements of Socialism--the common ownership of the chief instrument of production, the land, and the apportionment of the same according to the labour capacities of the different families; and we learn that if the communal possession of the land has been destroyed in Western Europe, it was not from within, but from without, by the governments which created a land monopoly in favour of the nobility and the middle classes. We learn, moreover, that the medieval cities succeeded in maintaining in their midst, for several centuries in succession, a certain socialized organization of production and trade; that these centuries were periods of a rapid intellectual, industrial, and artistic progress; while the decay of these communal institutions came mainly from the incapacity of men of combining the village with the city, the peasant with the citizen, so as jointly to oppose the growth of the military states, which…

全文を読む →

← ピョートル・クロポトキンに戻る