プロレタリア革命と背教者カウツキー
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 43,200 語 · 205 節
この作品を引用
- APAウラジーミル・レーニン. (n.d.). プロレタリア革命と背教者カウツキー. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky
- MLAウラジーミル・レーニン. "プロレタリア革命と背教者カウツキー." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky.
- Chicagoウラジーミル・レーニン. プロレタリア革命と背教者カウツキー. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky.
何についての本か
ボリシェヴィキが民主主義を破壊したと非難したカウツキーへの、レーニンの答え。
背景と歴史
プロレタリアート独裁を「いかなる法にも制限されない」権力として、レーニンが明確に擁護している文章である。目録にあるローザ・ルクセンブルクの『ロシア革命論』と並べて読むのが最良だ。あちらは、カウツキーと同じ批判をボリシェヴィズムの内側から出している。 原文はロシア語である。ここにあるのは英訳であり、引用は原文によるべきである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
Kautsky’s pamphlet, The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, recently published in Vienna (Wien, 1918, Ignaz Brand, pp. 63) is a most lucid example of that utter and ignominious bankruptcy of the Second International about which all honest socialists in all countries have been talking for a long time. The proletarian revolution is now becoming a practical issue in a number of countries, and an examination of Kautsky’s renegade sophistries and his complete renunciation of Marxism is therefore essential. First of all, it should be emphasised, however, that the present author has, from the very beginning of the war, repeatedly pointed to Kautsky’s rupture with Marxism. A number of articles published between 1914 and 1916 in Sotsial-Demokrat and Kommunist, issued abroad, dealt with this subject. These articles were afterwards collected and published by the Petrograd Soviet under the title Against the Stream, by G. Zinoviev and N. Lenin (Petrograd, 1918, pp. 550). In a pamphlet published in Geneva in 1915 and translated at the same time into German and French I wrote about “Kautskyism” as follows: “Kautsky, the leading authority in the Second International, is a most typical and striking example of how a verbal recognition of Marxism has led in practice to its conversion into ‘Struvism’, or into ‘Brentanoism’ [i.e., into a bourgeois-liberal theory recognising the non-revolutionary “class” struggle of the proletariat, which was expressed most clearly by Struve, the Russian writer, and Brentano, the German economist]. Another example is Plekhanov. By means of patent sophistry, Marxism is stripped of its revolutionary living spirit; everything is recognised in Marxism except the revolutionary methods of struggle, the propaganda and preparation of those methods, and the education of the masses in this direction.…