SigPhiSigPhi

マルクス主義の三つの源泉と三つの構成部分

ウラジーミル・レーニン

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 2,320 語 · 11 節
この作品を引用
  • APAウラジーミル・レーニン. (n.d.). The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [マルクス主義の三つの源泉と三つの構成部分]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism
  • MLAウラジーミル・レーニン. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [マルクス主義の三つの源泉と三つの構成部分]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.
  • Chicagoウラジーミル・レーニン. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [マルクス主義の三つの源泉と三つの構成部分]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.

収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。

何についての本か

一九一三年の論説。マルクス主義はドイツ哲学、イギリス経済学、フランス社会主義から来ている。

背景と歴史

三ページが、その後七十年のマルクス主義の教え方を定めた。短いのはこの文章がもともと短いからである。普及のための文章であって、本ではない。 原文はロシア語である。ここにあるのは英訳であり、引用は原文によるべきである。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

収録版からの抜粋
Where the bourgeois economists saw a relation between things (the exchange of one commodity for another) Marx revealed a relation between people. The exchange of commodities expresses the connection between individual producers through the market. Money signifies that the connection is becoming closer and closer, inseparably uniting the entire economic life of the individual producers into one whole. Capital signifies a further development of this connection: man’s labour-power becomes a commodity. The wage-worker sells his labour-power to the owner of land, factories and instruments of labour. The worker spends one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and his family (wages), while the other part of the day he works without remuneration, creating for the capitalist surplus-value, the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class. The doctrine of surplus-value is the corner-stone of Marx’s economic theory. Capital, created by the labour of the worker, crushes the worker, ruining small proprietors and creating an army of unemployed. In industry, the victory of large-scale production is immediately apparent, but the same phenomenon is also to be observed in agriculture, where the superiority of large-scale capitalist agriculture is enhanced, the use of machinery increases and the peasant economy, trapped by money-capital, declines and falls into ruin under the burden of its backward technique. The decline of small-scale production assumes different forms in agriculture, but the decline itself is an indisputable fact. By destroying small-scale production, capital leads to an increase in productivity of labour and to the creation of a monopoly position for the associations of big capitalists. Production itself becomes more and more social—hundreds of thousands and millions of workers become bound together in a regular economic organism—but the product of this collective labour is appropriated by a handful of capitalists.…

この版を読む →

← ウラジーミル・レーニンに戻る