アテナイ人とラケダイモン人の国制
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 帰属(著者は議論あり)
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 20,400 語 · 97 節
この作品を引用
- APAクセノフォン. (n.d.). The Polity of the Athenians and the Lacedaemonians [アテナイ人とラケダイモン人の国制]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/xenophon/the-polity-of-the-athenians-and-the-lacedaemonians
- MLAクセノフォン. The Polity of the Athenians and the Lacedaemonians [アテナイ人とラケダイモン人の国制]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/xenophon/the-polity-of-the-athenians-and-the-lacedaemonians.
- Chicagoクセノフォン. The Polity of the Athenians and the Lacedaemonians [アテナイ人とラケダイモン人の国制]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/xenophon/the-polity-of-the-athenians-and-the-lacedaemonians.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
スパルタとアテナイがどう組み立てられていたかについての二つの短い文章。
背景と歴史
スパルタのほうはクセノフォンのものである。アテナイのほうは伝統的に彼に帰されてきたが、「老寡頭」と呼ばれる無名の人の手になる。後者は注目に値する。アテナイの民主政を攻撃しながら、それが自分の目的にとって非常によく働いていることを認めているからだ。ちゃんと論じる敵である。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
There is just one thing which the Athenians lack. Supposing that they were the inhabitants of an island, (16) and were still, as now, rulers of the sea, they would have had it in their power to work whatever mischief they liked, and to suffer no evil in return (as long as they kept command of the sea), neither the ravaging of their territory nor the expectation of an enemy's approach. Whereas at present the farming portion of the community and the wealthy landowners are ready (17) to cringe before the enemy overmuch, whilst the People, knowing full well that, come what may, not one stock or stone of their property will suffer, nothing will be cut down, nothing burnt, lives in freedom from alarm, without fawning at the enemy's approach. Besides this, there is another fear from which they would have been exempt in an island home--the apprehension of the city being at any time betrayed by their oligarchs (18) and the gates thrown open, and an enemy bursting suddenly in. How could incidents like these have taken place if an island had been their home? Again, had they inhabited an island there would have been no stirring of sedition against the people; whereas at present, in the event of faction, those who set it in foot base their hopes of success on the introduction of an enemy by land. But a people inhabiting an island would be free from all anxiety on that score. Since, however, they did not chance to inhabit an island from the first, what they now do is this--they deposit their property in the islands, (19) trusting to their command of the sea, and they suffer the soil of Aticca to be ravaged without a sigh. To expend pity on that, they know, would be to deprive themselves of other blessings still more precious. (20) (16) See Thuc. i. 143. Pericles says: "Reflect, if we were islanders, who would be more invulnerable? Let us imagine that we are." (17) Or, "are the more ready to cringe." See, for the word {uperkhontai}, "Pol. Lac.…