SigPhiSigPhi

Протагор

Платон

Язык:
английский
Статус:
Полное произведение
Авторство:
Написано автором
Состояние текста:
Шумов сканирования не обнаружено (автоматическая оценка всего текста, вручную не проверялась)
Объём:
~27 600 слов · 131 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
  • APAПлатон. (n.d.). Protagoras [Протагор]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plato/protagoras
  • MLAПлатон. Protagoras [Протагор]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plato/protagoras.
  • ChicagoПлатон. Protagoras [Протагор]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plato/protagoras.

Ссылка на воспроизведённое издание. SigPhi — цифровая репродукция. Год, издатель и переводчик указаны, если известны; «n.d.» означает неизвестный год.

О чём это

Сократ спорит с самым знаменитым софистом своего времени о том, можно ли научить добродетели, и в конце каждый отстаивает исходное положение другого.

Контекст и история

Здесь миф о Прометее в изложении Протагора и первая формулировка мысли, что никто не творит зла сознательно, — сократовский нравственный интеллектуализм. Обмен позициями в конце сделан нарочно и есть одно из самых смешных мест у Платона.

Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.

Отрывок из доступного издания
own thoughts should supply them with the materials for discussion. A few soothing flatteries are addressed to Protagoras by Callias and Socrates, and then the old question is repeated, 'Whether the virtues are one or many?' To which Protagoras is now disposed to reply, that four out of the five virtues are in some degree similar; but he still contends that the fifth, courage, is unlike the rest. Socrates proceeds to undermine the last stronghold of the adversary, first obtaining from him the admission that all virtue is in the highest degree good:--The courageous are the confident; and the confident are those who know their business or profession: those who have no such knowledge and are still confident are madmen. This is admitted. Then, says Socrates, courage is knowledge--an inference which Protagoras evades by drawing a futile distinction between the courageous and the confident in a fluent speech. Socrates renews the attack from another side: he would like to know whether pleasure is not the only good, and pain the only evil? Protagoras seems to doubt the morality or propriety of assenting to this; he would rather say that 'some pleasures are good, some pains are evil,' which is also the opinion of the generality of mankind. What does he think of knowledge? Does he agree with the common opinion that knowledge is overcome by passion? or does he hold that knowledge is power? Protagoras agrees that knowledge is certainly a governing power. This, however, is not the doctrine of men in general, who maintain that many who know what is best, act contrary to their knowledge under the influence of pleasure. But this opposition of good and evil is really the opposition of a greater or lesser amount of pleasure. Pleasures are evils because they end in pain, and pains are goods because they end in pleasures. Thus pleasure is seen to be the only good; and the only evil is the preference of the lesser pleasure to the greater.…

Читать это издание →

← Назад к Платон