A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07
⚠️ Предупреждение о содержании
- Язык:
- английский
- Перевод:
- William F. Fleming
- Статус:
- Выборка или часть произведения
- Авторство:
- Написано автором
- Состояние текста:
- Шумов сканирования не обнаружено (автоматическая оценка всего текста, вручную не проверялась)
- Объём:
- ~77 700 слов · 369 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
- APAВольтер. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 (William F. Fleming, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07
- MLAВольтер. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
- ChicagoВольтер. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
Ссылка на издание, которое воспроизводит SigPhi: SigPhi — его цифровое воспроизведение, а не издатель. Год издания в метаданных не указан (отсюда «n.d.»), а переводчик указывается, только если он известен.
О чём это
Том 7 из десяти «Философского словаря». Невежество – Законы. Статьи о законах и о справедливости.
Контекст и история
Форма и есть довод: словарь не читают подряд, а справляются в нём, и потому его нельзя было опровергнуть целиком, зато легко было пускать по рукам. Вольтер напечатал его анонимно в 1764 году, и его сожгли в Женеве и в Париже. Примечание об издании: в каталоге ДВА издания «Философского словаря» — это в десяти томах и однотомный «Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary». Это не дубликат: это разные выборки и разные переводы, и статьи не соответствуют друг другу одна к одной. Подлинник французский.
Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.
Perhaps, by attending a little to the progress of his life, and the nature of his character, we may discover what it was that inspired him with so strong an aversion to Christianity. The emperor Constantine, his great-uncle, who had placed the new religion on the throne, was stained by the murder of his wife, his son, his brother-inlaw, his nephew, and his father-in-law. The three children of Constantine began their bloody and baleful reign, with murdering their uncle and their cousins. From that time followed a series of civil wars and murders. The father, the brother, and all the relations of Julian, and even Julian himself, were marked down for destruction by Constantius, his uncle. He escaped this general massacre, but the first years of his life were passed in exile, and he at last owed the preservation of his life, his fortune, and the title of Cæsar, only to Eusebia, the wife of his uncle Constantius, who, after having had the cruelty to proscribe his infancy, had the imprudence to appoint him Cæsar, and the still further and greater imprudence of then persecuting him. He was, in the first instance, a witness of the insolence with which a certain bishop treated his benefactress Eusebia. He was called Leontius, and was bishop of Tripoli. He sent information to the empress, "that he would not visit her unless she would consent to receive him in a manner corresponding to his episcopal dignity--that is, that she should advance to receive him at the door, that she should receive his benediction in a bending attitude, and that she should remain standing until he granted her permission to be seated." The Pagan pontiffs were not in the habit of treating princesses precisely in this manner, and such brutal arrogance could not but make a deep impression on the mind of a young man attached at once to philosophy and simplicity.