道德情操論
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 120,000 词 · 579 个段落
引用本作品
- APA亚当·斯密. (n.d.). 道德情操論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments
- MLA亚当·斯密. "道德情操論." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments.
- Chicago亚当·斯密. 道德情操論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments.
内容简介
亚当·斯密的第一部书,一七五九年。他在此说明道德判断如何生成:既不出于理性,也不出于诫命,而出于设身处地为他人着想的能力。
背景与流传
其机制是“同情”(sympathy)——这里不是怜悯,而是想象自己处于他人境地时会有何感受的能力。由这一活动生出“公正的旁观者”:那个我们据以衡量自身行为、充当良知的内在形象。此书宜在《国富论》之前读,而非之后:长久以来人们说有一个“亚当·斯密问题”,仿佛写同情的那个人与写自利的那个人互不相容。斯密本人并不这样看,而且他修订此书一直到去世那年——距另一部书出版已三十年。他的教席是道德哲学,不是经济学:这才是他的核心之作。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it. Of this kind is pity or compassion, the emotion which we feel for the misery of others, when we either see it, or are made to conceive it in a very lively manner. That we often derive sorrow from the sorrow of others, is a matter of fact too obvious to require any instances to prove it; for this sentiment, like all the other original passions of human nature, is by no means confined to the virtuous and humane, though they perhaps may feel it with the most exquisite sensibility. The greatest ruffian, the most hardened violator of the laws of society, is not altogether without it. As we have no immediate experience of what other men feel, we can form no idea of the manner in which they are affected, but by conceiving what we ourselves should feel in the like situation. Though our brother is upon the rack, as long as we ourselves are at our ease, our senses will never inform us of what he suffers. They never did and never can carry us beyond our own person, and it is by the imagination only that we can form any conception of what are his sensations. Neither can that faculty help us to this any other way, than by representing to us what would be our own, if we were in his case. It is the impressions of our own senses only, not those of his, which our imaginations copy. By the imagination we place ourselves in his situation, we conceive ourselves enduring all the same torments, we enter as it were into his body and become in some measure him, and thence form some idea of his sensations and even feel something which, though weaker in degree, is not altogether unlike them.…