民主在美國 (II)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 150,000 词 · 711 个段落
引用本作品
- APA亚历西斯·德·托克维尔. (n.d.). 民主在美國 (II). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/alexis-de-tocqueville/democracy-in-america-volume-2
- MLA亚历西斯·德·托克维尔. "民主在美國 (II)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/alexis-de-tocqueville/democracy-in-america-volume-2.
- Chicago亚历西斯·德·托克维尔. 民主在美國 (II). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/alexis-de-tocqueville/democracy-in-america-volume-2.
内容简介
一八四〇年的第二卷。托克维尔在此撇开美国的制度,转而考察平等对一个民族的思想、感受与生活方式起了什么作用。
背景与流传
一八三五年的第一卷讲美国民主如何运作;此卷更抽象,也更令人不安,而恰是此卷经得起时间。书中有“个人主义”——这个词由他推入流通,其义不是自私,而是退缩到小圈子之内;有多数人对意见的专制;有那种温和专制的诱惑,它把公民当作照料周到的未成年人;还有这样一个观察:在一个平等的社会里,剩下的差别越少,人们越是看得见它们。人们引托克维尔谈近代民主时,所引的正是这一卷。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
The Americans live in a democratic state of society, which has naturally suggested to them certain laws and a certain political character. This same state of society has, moreover, engendered amongst them a multitude of feelings and opinions which were unknown amongst the elder aristocratic communities of Europe: it has destroyed or modified all the relations which before existed, and established others of a novel kind. The--aspect of civil society has been no less affected by these changes than that of the political world. The former subject has been treated of in the work on the Democracy of America, which I published five years ago; to examine the latter is the object of the present book; but these two parts complete each other, and form one and the same work. I must at once warn the reader against an error which would be extremely prejudicial to me. When he finds that I attribute so many different consequences to the principle of equality, he may thence infer that I consider that principle to be the sole cause of all that takes place in the present age: but this would be to impute to me a very narrow view. A multitude of opinions, feelings, and propensities are now in existence, which owe their origin to circumstances unconnected with or even contrary to the principle of equality. Thus if I were to select the United States as an example, I could easily prove that the nature of the country, the origin of its inhabitants, the religion of its founders, their acquired knowledge, and their former habits, have exercised, and still exercise, independently of democracy, a vast influence upon the thoughts and feelings of that people.…