SigPhiSigPhi

论灵魂

亚里士多德

语言:
英语
译者:
Charles Collier
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 91,200 词 · 433 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA亚里士多德. (n.d.). De Anima (On the Soul) [论灵魂] (Charles Collier, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/de-anima-on-the-soul
  • MLA亚里士多德. De Anima (On the Soul) [论灵魂]. Translated by Charles Collier. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/de-anima-on-the-soul.
  • Chicago亚里士多德. De Anima (On the Soul) [论灵魂]. Translated by Charles Collier. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/de-anima-on-the-soul.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

亚里士多德论灵魂的著作。灵魂并非关在身体里的一个精灵,而是使一具活的身体成其为活的那个东西。

背景与流传

第二卷的界说——灵魂是潜在地具有生命的自然物体的“第一实现”——一举解开了柏拉图的难题:两种不同的实体如何结合?答曰不必结合,因为本来不是两个,正如斧的形状并非离铁而独存之物。由此排出一个阶梯:植物摄食而繁衍,动物更能感觉与运动,人更能思想。第三卷中有关于“能动理智”的一段,引出了一千五百年的注疏,因为亚里士多德在那里说这一部分是“可分离的、不受动的、不杂的”,却没有讲明它属于各人还是人所共有:阿维罗伊读作一义,托马斯读作另一义,这场争执一直延到文艺复兴。它同时也是我们所存最早的心理学与知觉理论的专著。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
of this essay is that something which gives to matter those attributes. The processes, then, of reproduction, growth, and decay, that is, generation, life, and death, are the essential characteristics of living beings, and conferred upon them, as has been said, by that something which is designated Vital Principle. Now, to homogeneous forms and solitary functions others of more complex nature are superadded, and these give rise to that long chain of being of which man may be regarded as the head; but yet, amid all the simplicity of organs, of action, and of reaction, those two functions still prevail, and constitute life, whatever the type of being, in its strictest signification. This is the teaching of Aristotle, as it is the doctrine of modern physiologists; and those functions are always here referred to as the essential conditions of whatever is animated, although, for higher forms of being, other organs and functions are required. The nature, however, of the essence or principle which originates and orders those living functions is hitherto for us, as it was for Aristotle, inscrutable; and it may be that the wide survey which he took of life, by complicating simple functions with sentient and even intellectual faculties, tended only to disturb and pervert the course of his inquiry. But whether Aristotle's mode of inquiry was or not faulty, and whether the principle which animates the world (it may be the universe) is or not among those causes which are inscrutable, it will be ever a topic of deep interest to the learned and the thoughtful of every age.

阅读全文 →

← 返回亚里士多德