范畴篇
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 14,700 词 · 70 个段落
引用本作品
- APA亚里士多德. (n.d.). 范畴篇. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-categories
- MLA亚里士多德. "范畴篇." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-categories.
- Chicago亚里士多德. 范畴篇. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-categories.
内容简介
西方逻辑由此开端的那部书:把一件事物述说出来的十种基本方式的名单。
背景与流传
实体、数量、性质、关系、地点、时间、姿态、所有、主动、被动。名单短,书也短,可名单背后的那个想法决定了两千年的形而上学:在一切可以述说的东西之中,有一个是凭自身而存在的——第一实体,这个人,这匹马——其余的一切,只有作为对它的述说才存在。波爱修把它译成拉丁文;整个中世纪里,它连同波菲利的《导论》,是任何人开始求学时读的第一部书:共相之争即由此而起。它是《工具论》——亚里士多德逻辑诸篇的总称——的首篇,本性简短;难处却一样都不少。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
Things are said to be named 'equivocally' when, though they have a common name, the definition corresponding with the name differs for each. Thus, a real man and a figure in a picture can both lay claim to the name 'animal'; yet these are equivocally so named, for, though they have a common name, the definition corresponding with the name differs for each. For should any one define in what sense each is an animal, his definition in the one case will be appropriate to that case only. On the other hand, things are said to be named 'univocally' which have both the name and the definition answering to the name in common. A man and an ox are both 'animal', and these are univocally so named, inasmuch as not only the name, but also the definition, is the same in both cases: for if a man should state in what sense each is an animal, the statement in the one case would be identical with that in the other. Things are said to be named 'derivatively', which derive their name from some other name, but differ from it in termination. Thus the grammarian derives his name from the word 'grammar', and the courageous man from the word 'courage'. Part 2 Forms of speech are either simple or composite. Examples of the latter are such expressions as 'the man runs', 'the man wins'; of the former 'man', 'ox', 'runs', 'wins'. Of things themselves some are predicable of a subject, and are never present in a subject. Thus 'man' is predicable of the individual man, and is never present in a subject. By being 'present in a subject' I do not mean present as parts are present in a whole, but being incapable of existence apart from the said subject. Some things, again, are present in a subject, but are never predicable of a subject.…