物理学 (I)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 译者:
- P. H. Wicksteed i F. M. Cornford
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 160,000 词 · 746 个段落
引用本作品
- APA亚里士多德. (n.d.). The Physics, Vol. I (Books I-IV) [物理学 (I)] (P. H. Wicksteed i F. M. Cornford, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-physics-vol-i-books-i-iv
- MLA亚里士多德. The Physics, Vol. I (Books I-IV) [物理学 (I)]. Translated by P. H. Wicksteed i F. M. Cornford. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-physics-vol-i-books-i-iv.
- Chicago亚里士多德. The Physics, Vol. I (Books I-IV) [物理学 (I)]. Translated by P. H. Wicksteed i F. M. Cornford. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/aristotle/the-physics-vol-i-books-i-iv.
这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。
内容简介
亚里士多德《物理学》第一卷,含第一至四卷书:一物“变化”是什么意思,以及自然、原因、偶然、运动、无限、处所、虚空与时间各是什么。
背景与流传
此处的“物理学”并非今日之义:它是关于凡自身之内含有运动与静止之本原者的学问,也就是关于“自然之物”而非“人造之物”的学问。前两卷书读者最多:四因说——质料因、形式因、动力因、目的因——即在其中,它统摄欧洲思想达两千年;书中并论证自然做事总是为着某个目的。第四卷书含有关于时间的讨论,奥古斯丁后来接了过去;也含有对虚空的否认,那是伽利略日后必须拆掉的。第五至八卷书在第二卷内。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
material world reaches our consciousness, are themselves material. So, though mind and matter cannot be resolved into each other either way, there are nevertheless close and intimate reactions between them. Experience makes us familiar with these reactions themselves; but (unless we are content with facile and unconvincing ‘ explanations’) it leaves them unexplainedand permanently mysterious, though it reveals some kind of kinship and correspondence between the worlds of matter and of mind. The fact, at least, remains that material things announce themselves to our consciousness xxi through our senses, and consciousness can act upon matter, immediately by causing the limbs of the conscious organism to move, or mediately by directing those limbs to move other things. So far Aristotle is quite content to accompany the plain man and to adopt his assumptions in their entirety. But he is very far from being content to leave these assumptions in the vague and undeveloped state in which the plain man holds them. For as soon as we begin to reflect upon them and try to connect and systematize them, they seem to reveal confusions and contradictions; and the plain man who has not been accustomed to hard thinking can easily be misled by thinkers who have themselves gone astray or by sophists who take pleasure in bewildering him. So Aristotle attempts to give precision to the plain man’s conceptions, to release him from confusions into which the ambiguities and imperfections of language may have betrayed him, to teach him to hold the thread of a continuous argument, to grapple with familiar but baffling concepts such as ‘ time,’ ‘cause,’ ‘ infinity,’ until he sees them steadily, and to detect the underlying agreements that are sometimes concealed under the mutual hostilities of rival schools of thought.…