西塞罗——致阿提库斯书信集,第1卷(共3卷)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰 · 4 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
- 篇幅:
- 约 130,000 词 · 639 个段落
引用本作品
- APA西塞罗. (n.d.). 西塞罗——致阿提库斯书信集,第1卷(共3卷). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/cicero-letters-to-atticus-vol-1-of-3
- MLA西塞罗. "西塞罗——致阿提库斯书信集,第1卷(共3卷)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/cicero-letters-to-atticus-vol-1-of-3.
- Chicago西塞罗. 西塞罗——致阿提库斯书信集,第1卷(共3卷). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/cicero-letters-to-atticus-vol-1-of-3.
内容简介
西塞罗致阿提库斯书信三卷中的第一卷:古代传下的最坦率的一批书信。
背景与流传
阿提库斯是西塞罗一生的朋友,一位富有的骑士,终身不求公职;正因如此,西塞罗写给他的信,与写给任何人的都不同:不摆姿态,一封信写到一半便改主意,求教,也坦白恐惧。这是从内部观看共和国末年的首要史料。读者请注意:本目录中另有《西塞罗书信集》,那是另一种版本,按年月汇集全部往来书信——因此致阿提库斯诸信在那里也有一份。这并非错误:二者是同一批材料的两种不同版本,译文与编次都不同。知道这一点是必要的,因为同一封信可能以不同的文字出现两次,引用时必须注明所据何本。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
The letters contained in this volume cover a large and important period in Cicero’s life and in the history of Rome. They begin when he was 38 years of age; and at first they are not very numerous. There are only two of that year (68 B.C.), six of the following year, one of the year 66, when he held the praetorship, and two of 65. Then there is a gap in his correspondence. No letters at all survive from the period of his consulship and the Catilinarian conspiracy; and the letters to Atticus do not begin again until two years after that event. Thereafter they are sufficiently frequent to justify Cornelius Nepos’ criticism, that reading them, one has little need of an elaborate history of the period. There are full—almost too full—details, considering the frequent complaints and repetitions, during the year of his banishment (58–57 B.C.), and the correspondence continues unbroken to the year 54. Then after a lapse of two years or more, which Atticus presumably spent in Rome, it begins again in 51, when Cicero was sent to Cilicia as pro-consul, much against his will; and the volume ends with a hint of the trouble that was brewing between Caesar and Pompey, as Cicero was returning to Rome towards the end of the next year. The letters have been translated in the traditionary order in which they are usually printed. That order, however, is not strictly chronological; and, for the convenience of those who would read them in their historical order, a table arranging them so far as possible in order of date has been drawn up at the end of the volume. For the basis of the text the Teubner edition has been used; but it has been revised by comparison with more recent works and papers on the subject. Textual notes have only been given in a few cases where the reading is especially corrupt or uncertain; and other notes too have been confined to cases where they seemed absolutely indispensable.…