论义务 (ed. 2)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 61,700 词 · 293 个段落
引用本作品
- APA西塞罗. (n.d.). 论义务 (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/de-officiis-en
- MLA西塞罗. "论义务 (ed. 2)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/de-officiis-en.
- Chicago西塞罗. 论义务 (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/cicero/de-officiis-en.
内容简介
《论义务》英译本。拉丁原本亦收在本目录中,应当引用的是原本。
背景与流传
此书作于公元前四四年,是西塞罗的最后一部著作,为其子马库斯而写,其时政治形势正向他合拢;次年他即被杀。此译本在此是为读者预备的:若要核对某一句,或要讨论 honestum 与 utile 这两个词译得如何——它们在任何现代语言里都没有干净的对应——都须回到拉丁原文。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
Harvard University Press; Cambridge, Mass., London, England English Greek GRC tagging Book I: Moral Goodness My dear son Marcus, you have now been studying Introduction: the importance of combining Greek and Latin studies. a full year under Cratippus, and that too in Athens, and you should be fully equipped with the practical precepts and the principles of philosophy; so much at least one might expect from the pre-eminence not only of your teacher but also of the city; the former is able to enrich you with learning, the latter to supply you with models. Nevertheless, just as I for my own improvement have always combined Greek and Latin studies—and I have done this not only in the study of philosophy but also in the practice of oratory—so I recommend that you should do the same, so that you may have equal command of both languages. And it is in this very direction that I have, if I mistake not, rendered a great service to our countrymen, so that not only those who are unacquainted with Greek literature but even the cultured consider that they have gained much both in oratorical power and in mental training. You will, therefore, learn from the foremost of Greek Philosophy and Cicero's own. present-day philosophers, and you will go on learning as long as you wish; and your wish ought to continue as long as you are not dissatisfied with the progress you are making. For all that, if you will read my philosophical books, you will be helped; my philosophy is not very different from that of the Peripatetics (for both they and I claim to be followers of Socrates and Plato).…