SigPhiSigPhi

宗教生活的基本形式

埃米尔·涂尔干

语言:
英语
译者:
J. W. Swain
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 270,000 词 · 1,285 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA埃米尔·涂尔干. (n.d.). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [宗教生活的基本形式] (J. W. Swain, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life
  • MLA埃米尔·涂尔干. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [宗教生活的基本形式]. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
  • Chicago埃米尔·涂尔干. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [宗教生活的基本形式]. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

涂尔干在此书中寻找宗教最简单的形态,以求理解一切宗教,并得出结论:一个社会所崇拜的,其实是它自己,只是它并不自知。

背景与流传

一九一二年出版。他取澳大利亚原住民的图腾制度作为“初级”个案,而这里需要一句诚实的说明:涂尔干从未到过那里。他依据的是他人的民族志,而那些材料后来受到很大质疑——既因其质量,也因“那些社会是初级的”这一预设。至于社会学的论证本身——神圣即集体的力量,仪式即维系这力量者——则远比它所依据的材料经得起时间。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选
the causes which called it into existence, though remaining active, are no longer perceived, except across a vast scheme of interpretations which quite transform them. Popular mythologies and subtile theologies have done their work: they have superimposed upon the primitive sentiments others which are quite different, and which, though holding to the first, of which they are an elaborated form, only allow their true nature to appear very imperfectly. The psychological gap between the cause and the effect, between the apparent cause and the effective cause, has become more considerable and more difficult for the mind to leap. The remainder of this book will be an illustration and a verification of this remark on method. It will be seen how, in the primitive religions, the religious fact still visibly carries the mark of its origins: it would have been well-nigh impossible to infer them merely from the study of the more developed religions. The study which we are undertaking is therefore a way of taking up again, _but under new conditions_, the old problem of the origin of religion. To be sure, if by origin we are to understand the very first beginning, the question has nothing scientific about it, and should be resolutely discarded. There was no given moment when religion began to exist, and there is consequently no need of finding a means of transporting ourselves thither in thought. Like every human institution, religion did not commence anywhere. Therefore, all speculations of this sort are justly discredited; they can only consist in subjective and arbitrary constructions which are subject to no sort of control. But the problem which we raise is quite another one. What we want to do is to find a means of discerning the ever-present causes upon which the most essential forms of religious thought and practice depend.…

阅读此版本 →

← 返回埃米尔·涂尔干