创化论
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰 · 10 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
- 篇幅:
- 约 180,000 词 · 844 个段落
引用本作品
- APA亨利·柏格森. (n.d.). 创化论. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
- MLA亨利·柏格森. "创化论." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
- Chicago亨利·柏格森. 创化论. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
内容简介
柏格森的主张:演化既不能用偶然解释,也不能用预定的蓝图解释,而要用一种冲动——“生命冲力”——来解释;它不断尝试路径,并向彼此分歧的方向分流。
背景与流传
一九〇七年出版,此书在哲学界之外获得了极大成功,使他成为名人;一九二七年他获颁诺贝尔文学奖。经受住时间考验的并非“生命冲力”——生物学从未接受它——而是他对“理智如何制造时间”的批判:柏格森主张,思维本是为行动而生的,它把绵延化为一连串静止的瞬间,因而无法思考正在变化的东西。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
The history of the evolution of life, incomplete as it yet is, already reveals to us how the intellect has been formed, by an uninterrupted progress, along a line which ascends through the vertebrate series up to man. It shows us in the faculty of understanding an appendage of the faculty of acting, a more and more precise, more and more complex and supple adaptation of the consciousness of living beings to the conditions of existence that are made for them. Hence should result this consequence that our intellect, in the narrow sense of the word, is intended to secure the perfect fitting of our body to its environment, to represent the relations of external things among themselves--in short, to think matter. Such will indeed be one of the conclusions of the present essay. We shall see that the human intellect feels at home among inanimate objects, more especially among solids, where our action finds its fulcrum and our industry its tools; that our concepts have been formed on the model of solids; that our logic is, pre-eminently, the logic of solids; that, consequently, our intellect triumphs in geometry, wherein is revealed the kinship of logical thought with unorganized matter, and where the intellect has only to follow its natural movement, after the lightest possible contact with experience, in order to go from discovery to discovery, sure that experience is following behind it and will justify it invariably. But from this it must also follow that our thought, in its purely logical form, is incapable of presenting the true nature of life, the full meaning of the evolutionary movement. Created by life, in definite circumstances, to act on definite things, how can it embrace life, of which it is only an emanation or an aspect? Deposited by the evolutionary movement in the course of its way, how can it be applied to the evolutionary movement itself?…