SigPhiSigPhi

On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians (De Mysteriis)

扬布利科斯

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰
篇幅:
约 100,000 词 · 486 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA扬布利科斯. (n.d.). On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians (De Mysteriis). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/iamblichus/on-the-mysteries-of-the-egyptians-chaldeans-and-assyrians-de-mysteriis
  • MLA扬布利科斯. "On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians (De Mysteriis)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/iamblichus/on-the-mysteries-of-the-egyptians-chaldeans-and-assyrians-de-mysteriis.
  • Chicago扬布利科斯. On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians (De Mysteriis). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/iamblichus/on-the-mysteries-of-the-egyptians-chaldeans-and-assyrians-de-mysteriis.

内容简介

扬布利科斯对波菲利来信的答复。波菲利曾以怀疑的口吻问:哲人何须行祭仪?此文遂成为现存关于“神通术”(theurgia)最完整的辩护。

背景与流传

波菲利提出的诘难合乎情理:神若无所感受,祈祷何以能动之?神若为善,仪式何以能强之?扬布利科斯回答说:出问题的是那条前提。神通术之所以有效,并非因为哲人理解了什么,而是因为那些仪式本身就是神所设立的记号;即便行礼者不知其所以然,它们照样起作用。他由此把得救与理智分开,也把新柏拉图主义向宗教实践敞开。正是这一文本决定了后来的新柏拉图主义(包括普罗克洛),并被“背教者”尤利安用作他复兴异教之举的根据。书名出自一位文艺复兴时期的编者,并非扬布利科斯所题。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
O 5e AptfOT«Xi)S Trpos Avriirarpov mpi AXefavSpov ypa(j)<t)v, p.i) p.ovov cxeivu npoarjKfiv on noWwv Kpam fieya(f>poveiv, aXV ovSev r)TTOV ci T15 opScos yivaxricei rrepi Seojv. PLUTARCH. ^econii tuition. LONDON; BERTRAM DOBELL, 77 CHARING CROSS ROAD, W.C. AND REEVES AND TURNER, 5 WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND. MDCCOXCV. \H'icdcQi^)Le jbi'brary for tile History and Understanding of Medicine Bl/. A/^l ADVERTISEMENT. The various translations and original works of Thomas Taylor, though still in request by the more zealous students of ancient philosophy and occult science, have now become so scarce and expensive that it is only within the power of comparatively wealthy collectors to obtain them. This is a matter for regret, inasmuch as it cannot be affirmed that his writings have been, or are likely to be superseded, or that they are without value. They can hardly be neglected without loss by those who desire to understand the systems of philosophy which satisfied the spiritual needs of the antique world. It is not possible, even for the most feivent believer in modern “ progress,” to dismiss the speculations of the ancient philosophers as antiquated notions which have had their day and no longer possess interest or value. The names of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle can never grow dim with age, nor is it possible to conceive a time when men shall cease to study and reverence them. As the disciple, the translator, and the expounder of VI

阅读全文 →

← 返回扬布利科斯