耆那教经典 II:郁多罗行经与修多罗吉当伽
- 语言:
- 英语
- 译者:
- Hermann Jacobi
- 状态:
- 选辑或部分作品
- 作者归属:
- 佚名或集体成书
- 文本状况:
- 含扫描错误 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对) · 32 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
- 篇幅:
- 约 140,000 词 · 686 个段落
引用本作品
- APA耆那教经典. (n.d.). Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [耆那教经典 II:郁多罗行经与修多罗吉当伽] (Hermann Jacobi, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv
- MLA耆那教经典. Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [耆那教经典 II:郁多罗行经与修多罗吉当伽]. Translated by Hermann Jacobi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv.
- Chicago耆那教经典. Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [耆那教经典 II:郁多罗行经与修多罗吉当伽]. Translated by Hermann Jacobi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv.
本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。
内容简介
雅可比为《东方圣书》所译耆那教典籍的第二部分:《后续经》(Uttarādhyayana)与《经造支》(Sūtrakṛtāṅga)。
背景与流传
耆那教是印度现存最古老的宗教传统之一,与佛教同时而各自独立。《后续经》是韵文教诲的汇集,传统上视为大雄的临终之言,其中兼有叙事与对话;《经造支》则更重教义,大半用以铺陈并驳斥当时的敌对学说,因而是了解公元前五世纪印度思想状况的第一等史料。两个核心观念是“不害”(ahiṃsā)——彻底的非暴力,推及一切有生之物——以及“多面说”(anekāntavāda):实在有多重面向,任何片面的断言都不能把它整个把握。第一部分在语料库中另有其目。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
the Uttaradhyayana, Lecture XXIII, how the union of the old and the new church was effected, is of much interest in this respect. Kesi and Gautama, the representatives and leaders of the two branches of the 6"aina church, both at the head of their pupils, meet in a park near 5ravasti ; the differences in their creed concerning the number of great vows, and the use or disuse of clothes are explained away without further discussion, and full harmony with regard to the fundamental ethical ideas is satisfactorily established by the readiness with which allegorical expressions of the one speaker are understood and explained by the other. There seems to have been some estrangement, but no hostility between the two branches of the church ; and though the members of the older branch invariably are made to adopt the Law of Mahavira, ' which enjoins five vows,' it may be imagined that they continued in some of their old practices, especially with regard to the use of clothes, which Mahavira had abandoned. On this assumption we can account for the division of the church in 5vetambaras and Digambaras, about the origin of which both sects have contradictory legends^. There was apparently no sudden rupture; but an original diversity (such as e. g. subsists now between the several Gakk/ias of the ^vetambaras) ripened into division, and in the end brought about the great schism. The records in the Buddhist Canon are not repugnant to our views about the existence of the Niga;///^as before Nataputta; for the Nigaw/Z/as must have been an important sect at the time when Buddhism took its rise. This may be inferred from the fact that they are so frequently mentioned in the Pi/akas as opponents or converts of Buddha and his disciples ; and as it is nowhere said or even merely implied that the Niga«//^as were a newly-founded sect, we may conclude that they had already existed a considerable time before the advent of the Buddha.…