SigPhiSigPhi

逻辑理论研究

约翰·杜威

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰
篇幅:
约 140,000 词 · 684 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA约翰·杜威. (n.d.). 逻辑理论研究. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory
  • MLA约翰·杜威. "逻辑理论研究." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory.
  • Chicago约翰·杜威. 逻辑理论研究. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory.

内容简介

一九〇三年的这部合集,杜威与他在芝加哥的同事们借以陈述他们对“思维”的理解:思维不是世界的镜子,而是脱离困境的工具。

背景与流传

其中四篇由杜威署名,其余出自他的学生之手;此书造就了后来所谓实用主义的“芝加哥学派”。其命题是:逻辑所当研究的不是永恒的形式,而是实际的探究——思维起于某个情境变得成问题之时,它提出假设、加以检验,而当情境重新可行时,思维便告结束。在这一格局里,真理不是符合,而是一次做得妥当的探究所得的结果。威廉·詹姆斯称此书为实用主义的成年;罗素则从中看出了“知”与“行”的混淆。这场讨论在《实验逻辑论集》中续有展开,该书语料库中亦有。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
This volume presents some results of the work done in the matter of logical theory in the Department of Philosophy of the University of Chicago in the first decade of its existence. The eleven Studies are the work of eight different hands, all, with the exception of the editor, having at some period held Fellowships in this University, Dr. Heidel in Greek, the others in Philosophy. Their names and present pursuits are indicated in the Table of Contents. The editor has occasionally, though rarely, added a footnote or phrase which might serve to connect one Study more closely with another. The pages in the discussion of Hypothesis, on Mill and Whewell, are by him. With these exceptions, each writer is individually and completely responsible for his own Study. The various Studies present, the editor believes, about the relative amount of agreement and disagreement that is natural in view of the conditions of their origin. The various writers have been in contact with one another in Seminars and lecture courses in pursuit of the same topics, and have had to do with shaping one another's views. There are several others, not represented in this volume, who have also participated in the evolution of the point of view herein set forth, and to whom the writers acknowledge their indebtedness. The disagreements proceed from the diversity of interests with which the different writers approach the logical topic; and from the fact that the point of view in question is still (happily) developing and showing no signs of becoming a closed system. If the Studies themselves do not give a fair notion of the nature and degree of the harmony in the different writers' methods, a preface is not likely to succeed in so doing. A few words may be in place, however, about a matter repeatedly touched upon, but nowhere consecutively elaborated--the more ultimate philosophical bearing of what is set forth.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回约翰·杜威