妇女的屈从地位
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 45,500 词 · 216 个段落
引用本作品
- APA约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. (n.d.). The Subjection of Women [妇女的屈从地位]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women
- MLA约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. The Subjection of Women [妇女的屈从地位]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women.
- Chicago约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. The Subjection of Women [妇女的屈从地位]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women.
这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。
内容简介
《妇女的屈从地位》(1869):两性之间的不平等是强者法则的残余,不是自然事实。
背景与流传
与哈丽雅特·泰勒合著,是十九世纪由男性写下的最重要的女性主义文本。它的核心论点至今仍然难以反驳:没有人能知道女性身上什么是「自然的」,因为从来没有哪个女性是在自由中生活过的。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
vitality and durability of institutions which place right on the side of might; how intensely they are clung to; how the good as well as the bad propensities and sentiments of those who have power in their hands, become identified with retaining it; how slowly these bad institutions give way, one at a time, the weakest first, beginning with those which are least interwoven with the daily habits of life; and how very rarely those who have obtained legal power because they first had physical, have ever lost their hold of it until the physical power had passed over to the other side. Such shifting of the physical force not having taken place in the case of women; this fact, combined with all the peculiar and characteristic features of the particular case, made it certain from the first that this branch of the system of right founded on might, though softened in its most atrocious features at an earlier period than several of the others, would be the very last to disappear. It was inevitable that this one case of a social relation grounded on force, would survive through generations of institutions grounded on equal justice, an almost solitary exception to the general character of their laws and customs; but which, so long as it does not proclaim its own origin, and as discussion has not brought out its true character, is not felt to jar with modern civilization, any more than domestic slavery among the Greeks jarred with their notion of themselves as a free people. The truth is, that people of the present and the last two or three generations have lost all practical sense of the primitive condition of humanity; and only the few who have studied history accurately, or have much frequented the parts of the world occupied by the living representatives of ages long past, are able to form any mental picture of what society then was.…