The Philosophy of Loyalty
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 79,400 词 · 377 个段落
引用本作品
- APA乔赛亚·罗伊斯. (n.d.). The Philosophy of Loyalty. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-philosophy-of-loyalty
- MLA乔赛亚·罗伊斯. "The Philosophy of Loyalty." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-philosophy-of-loyalty.
- Chicago乔赛亚·罗伊斯. The Philosophy of Loyalty. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-philosophy-of-loyalty.
内容简介
《忠的哲学》(1908)。
背景与流传
罗伊斯提出把「忠」当作核心的道德原则:不是忠于任何事业,而是忠于那些本身能滋养他人之忠的事业——即「忠于忠」。这是美国唯心论对他的朋友兼对手威廉·詹姆斯的实用主义所作的回应,而两人在哈佛同事了一辈子。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO ATLANTA • SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO., LIMITED LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD. TORONTO BY JOSIAH ROYCE PROFESSOR OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY Nefo gorfc THE MACMILLAN COMPANY All rights reserved ^ **/ 1 COPYBIOHT, 1908, BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published March, 1908. Reprinted August, 1908. NortoootJ J. 8. Gushing Co. — Berwick & Smith Co. Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. PREFACE IN 1906 and 1907 I gave, as a part of my regular work at the Summer School of Har vard University, an " Introduction to Ethics, with Special Reference to the Interests of Teachers." A few lectures, summing up the main principles that lay at the basis of this ethical course as it had been given in the summer of 1906, were delivered in January and February, 1907, before a general academic audience, during a brief visit of mine at the University of Illinois. In several other places, both in the West and in the East, I have also presented portions of my views upon ethics; and in the summer of 1907 four general lectures on the topic were repeated before the Summer School of Theology at Harvard. In November and December of 1907 the lectures that constitute the present book were delivered for the first time before the Lowell Institute in Boston. vi PREFACE vi PREFACE In preparing this new statement of my case for the Lowell Institute course, I thus had the opportunity to use the experience and the criticisms that had resulted from several previous efforts of mine to set forth my views about the topics treated in this " Philosophy of Loyalty." The Lowell Institute lectures were, in fact, substantially a fresh presenta tion of the material, — only Lecture V, on " American Problems," retaining any large portion of the text of any of my former lec tures.…