SigPhiSigPhi

The Religious Aspect of Philosophy

乔赛亚·罗伊斯

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 180,000 词 · 837 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA乔赛亚·罗伊斯. (n.d.). The Religious Aspect of Philosophy. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-religious-aspect-of-philosophy
  • MLA乔赛亚·罗伊斯. The Religious Aspect of Philosophy. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-religious-aspect-of-philosophy.
  • Chicago乔赛亚·罗伊斯. The Religious Aspect of Philosophy. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/josiah-royce/the-religious-aspect-of-philosophy.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

罗伊斯的第一部大著,以及他被人记住的那个论证:仅仅“我们可能出错”这一事实,就要求存在一种同时容纳我们的判断与被判断之物的思想。

背景与流传

一八八五年出版。推论如下:说某个信念为假,就是拿它与其真实对象相比较;而这比较总须在某处进行。若不存在一种同时包含二者的思想,错误便不可能。既然错误确实存在,那种思想也就存在。罗伊斯是美国的唯心论者,也是威廉·詹姆斯一生的论辩对手——詹姆斯并不同意他;把两人对照着读,是读他们的最好办法。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选
philosophy tries to find out what it can about the real world. When it makes this effort, it has to be perfectly indifferent to consequences. It may not shudder or murmur if it comes upon unspeakably dreadful truths. If it finds nothing in the world but evil, it must still accept the truth, and must calmly state it without praise and without condemnation. Theoretic philosophy knows no passion save the pas¬ sion for truth, has no fear save the fear of error, cherishes no hope save the hope of theoretic success. But religious philosophy has other objects in addi¬ tion to these. Religious philosophy is indeed neither the foe nor the mistress of theoretic philosophy. Re¬ ligious philosophy dare not be in opposition to the truths that theory may have established. But over and above these truths it seeks something else. It seeks to know their value. It comes to the world with other interests, in addition to the purely theo¬ retic ones. It wants to know what in the world is worthy of worship as the good. It seeks not merely the truth, but the inspiring truth. It defines for it¬ self goodness, moral worth, and then it asks, What in this world is worth anything t Its demands in this regard are boundless. It will be content only with the best it can find. Having formulated for itself its ideal of worth, it asks at the outset: Is there then , anywhere in the universe , any real thing of Infinite Worth ? If this cannot be found, then

阅读此版本 →

← 返回乔赛亚·罗伊斯