First Apology
- 语言:
- 英语
- 译者:
- Chevallier
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 34,100 词 · 162 个段落
引用本作品
- APA殉道者游斯丁. (n.d.). First Apology (Chevallier, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/justin-martyr/first-apology
- MLA殉道者游斯丁. First Apology. Translated by Chevallier. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/justin-martyr/first-apology.
- Chicago殉道者游斯丁. First Apology. Translated by Chevallier. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/justin-martyr/first-apology.
本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。
内容简介
游斯丁《第一护教书》(约155年)。
背景与流传
写给皇帝安敦宁·毕尤:一位归信的哲学家论证基督徒既不是无神论者也不是叛乱者,并说明他们聚会时都做些什么。其中对洗礼和圣餐的描述,是福音书之外现存最早的。游斯丁被斩首,因此有了「殉道者」这个称号。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
9. Neither again do we^honor with numerous sacrifices and garlands of flowers, those, whom men hare invested with a bodily shape, and placed in temples* and then denominated gods. We well know that these are senseless and dead, possessing not the form of God. We imagine not that God hath such a bodily shape as some pretend to imitate, to his honor; and are persuaded that these images have not the form of God, but the names and figures of those evil demons which have appeared. For why should I repeat to you, who know so well, in what manner the workmen treat their materials, polishing, cutting, melting, and hammering, and frequently out of the meanest vessels, by merely changing their form, aqd fashioning them anew, giving them the name of gods? r In our opinion this is not only unreasonable, but offers great dishonor to God, who, although he possesses a glory and form which are inexpressible, is thus named after corruptible things and such as require care to preserve them. Ye well know, also, that those who are occupied in these works lead most impure lives, and, not to dwell upon particulars, practise all kinds of wickedness, so gg that they even corrupt the women who assist them in their works. O astonishing blindness ! that men thus impure should be said* to form and change the fashion of gods, for the purpose of worship ; and that such men should be placed as guards of the temples where they are set up, not considering that it is impious either to imagine or to say, that men are the keepers of gods.