书信与讲道集(含《致弗拉维安书》)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 译者:
- C. L. Feltoe
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 210,000 词 · 1,006 个段落
引用本作品
- APA利奥一世. (n.d.). 书信与讲道集(含《致弗拉维安书》). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian
- MLA利奥一世. "书信与讲道集(含《致弗拉维安书》)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian.
- Chicago利奥一世. 书信与讲道集(含《致弗拉维安书》). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian.
内容简介
大良(利奥一世)的书信与讲道,其中包括《致弗拉维安书》——这封信确定了“基督同时是神又是人”该如何理解。
背景与流传
此信作于四四九年,后果立竿见影:四五一年迦克墩公会议上,它被当众诵读,众主教欢呼说“彼得藉良之口说话”。由此确立的“一位格、二性”的公式,至今仍界定着大多数教会的基督论——也导致了不接受这一公式的教会分离出去。讲道则是另一回事:篇幅短小、本为口讲而作,可借以窥见五世纪罗马的讲道之风。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
Except for such valuable help — chiefly however in the way of comment and explanation — as Canon Bright' s volume (S. Leo on the Incarnation) has supplied, both the selection and the translation of the Letters and Sermons of Leo Magnus are practically original. It is even more difficult to feel satisfied oneself, than to satisfy others either with a selection from a great man's works or with a translation of them. The powers of Leo as a preacher both of doctrine and of practice are very remarkable, and in my anxiety to keep within the limits imposed by the publishers, I have erred in presenting too few rather than too many of the Sermons to the English reader. Only those that are generally held genuine are represented, though several of the doubtful ones are fine sermons, and those translated are in most cases no better than those omitted. Even when the same thought is repeated again and again (as if often the case), it is almost always clothed in such different language, and surrounded with so many other thoughts of value, that every sermon has an equal claim to be selected. With regard to the Letters, the series connected with the Eutychian controversy — the chief occupation of Leo's episcopate — is given nearly complete, whereas only specimens of his mode of dealing with other matters have been selected for presentation. With one or two exceptions, however, I feel more confident about the Letters than about the Sermons that the omitted are less important than the included. I wish I could make even a similar boast about the merits of the translation. The text rendered is for the most part that of the Ballerinii as given by Migne (Patrologie, Vol. LIV.), though a more critical edition is much to be desired Charles Lett Feltoe.…