SigPhiSigPhi

On the Jews and Their Lies (Von den Juden und ihren Lügen, 1543)

马丁·路德

⚠️ 内容警示

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰
篇幅:
约 56,800 词 · 270 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA马丁·路德. (n.d.). On the Jews and Their Lies (Von den Juden und ihren Lügen, 1543). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/on-the-jews-and-their-lies-von-den-juden-und-ihren-lugen-1543
  • MLA马丁·路德. "On the Jews and Their Lies (Von den Juden und ihren Lügen, 1543)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/on-the-jews-and-their-lies-von-den-juden-und-ihren-lugen-1543.
  • Chicago马丁·路德. On the Jews and Their Lies (Von den Juden und ihren Lügen, 1543). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/on-the-jews-and-their-lies-von-den-juden-und-ihren-lugen-1543.

内容简介

《论犹太人和他们的谎言》(1543):路德的一部反犹文本。

背景与流传

**注意:这个文本呼吁烧毁犹太会堂和犹太人的住宅、没收他们的书、把他们驱逐出去。**这不是牵强的解读:书上就是这么写的。 它之所以在目录中,是因为这里的规矩是**任何作品都不因内容而被移除**,也是因为把它藏起来等于假装它不存在。路德写它时六十岁,此前他已经等犹太人归信等了几十年;纳粹重印过它、也把它拿出来展示过,而德国和美国的路德宗教会已经正式与它划清界限。 想弄懂路德的人必须知道它。要引用它的人,必须知道自己引的是什么再引。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
At the beginning of his career it is often said that Luther was apparently sympathetic to Jewish resistance to the Catholic Church. He wrote, early in his career: The Jews are blood-relations of our Lord; if it were proper to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews belong more to Christ than we. I beg, therefore, my dear Papist, if you become tired of abusing me as a heretic, that you begin to revile me as a Jew. However, sometime before 1517, in his Letters to Spalatin, we can already see that Luther's hatred of Jews, best seen in tis 1543 letter, was not some affectation of old age, but was present very early on. Luther expected Jews to convert to his purified Christianity. When they did not, he turned violently against them. It is impossible for modern people to read the horrible passages below and not to think of the burning of synagogues in November 1938 on Krystalnacht. Nor would one wish to excuse Luther for this text. A number of points must, however, be made. The most important concerns the language used. Luther used violent and vulgar language throughout his career: he was not a man to say "manure" when he meant "shit". We do not expect religious figures to use this sort of language in the modern world, but it was not uncommon in the early 16th century. Second, although Luther's comments seem to be proto-Nazi, they are better seen as part of tradition of Medieval Christian anti-semitism. While there is little doubt that Christian anti-Semitism laid the social and cultural basis for modern anti-Semitism, modern anti-Semitism does differ in being based on pseudscientific notions of race. The Nazis imprisoned and killed Jews who had converted to Christianity: Luther would have welcomed them. None of this justifies what follows, but it may help to comprehend what is being written here.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回马丁·路德