马丁·路德文集,第一卷
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰 · 8 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
- 篇幅:
- 约 160,000 词 · 752 个段落
引用本作品
- APA马丁·路德. (n.d.). 马丁·路德文集,第一卷. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/works-of-martin-luther-volume-i
- MLA马丁·路德. "马丁·路德文集,第一卷." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/works-of-martin-luther-volume-i.
- Chicago马丁·路德. 马丁·路德文集,第一卷. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/martin-luther/works-of-martin-luther-volume-i.
内容简介
路德著作费城英译本第一卷,收一五一七至一五二〇年间开启宗教改革的那批文字。
背景与流传
其中有关于赎罪券的九十五条论纲——路德写它是为召开一场学院内的辩论,并非要与罗马决裂——以及他后来那份远为明确的解释。也有一五二〇年的三大文献,正是它们使决裂无从挽回:《致德意志基督教贵族公开书》,请诸侯来改革教会,因为教士不肯做;《教会被掳于巴比伦》,把七件圣礼减为两件;以及《基督徒的自由》,三者中最平和的一篇,内有那句双重的表述——基督徒是全然自由的万物之主,又是全然顺服的众人之仆。宜依此顺序读:这是一个人一年之内的生命,从提议一场辩论,到被逐出教会。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
"A Disputation of the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences" [1] is the full title of the document commonly called "The Ninety-five Theses." The form of the document was determined by the academic practice of the Middle Ages. In all the Mediæval Universities the "disputation" was a well-established institution. It was a debate, conducted according to accepted rules, on any subject which the chief disputant might elect, and no student's education was thought to be complete until he had shown his ability to defend himself in discussions of this kind. It was customary to set forth the subject which was to be discussed, in a series of "theses," which were statements of opinion tentatively advanced as the basis of argument. The author, or some other person he might designate, announced himself ready to defend these statements against all comers, and invited all who might wish to debate with him to a part in the discussion. Such an academic document, one out of many hundreds, exhaling the atmosphere of the Mediæval University, is the Disputation, which by its historical importance has earned the name "The XCV Theses." The Theses were published on the Eve of All Saints (Oct 31), 1517. They were not intended for any other public than that of the University,[2] and Luther did not even have them printed at first, though copies were forwarded to the Archbishop of Mainz, and to Luther's own diocesan, the Bishop of Brandenburg. The manner of their publication too was academic.…