SigPhiSigPhi

The Works of Philo Judaeus, Vol. IV (Yonge)

亚历山大的斐洛

语言:
英语
译者:
C. D. Yonge
状态:
选辑或部分作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 280,000 词 · 1,338 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA亚历山大的斐洛. (n.d.). The Works of Philo Judaeus, Vol. IV (Yonge) (C. D. Yonge, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/philo-of-alexandria/the-works-of-philo-judaeus-vol-iv-yonge
  • MLA亚历山大的斐洛. The Works of Philo Judaeus, Vol. IV (Yonge). Translated by C. D. Yonge. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/philo-of-alexandria/the-works-of-philo-judaeus-vol-iv-yonge.
  • Chicago亚历山大的斐洛. The Works of Philo Judaeus, Vol. IV (Yonge). Translated by C. D. Yonge. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/philo-of-alexandria/the-works-of-philo-judaeus-vol-iv-yonge.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

斐洛论著集第四卷,扬吉(C. D. Yonge)英译,全书至此告竣。

背景与流传

与前几卷同:分卷出自十九世纪扬吉的版本,而非斐洛本人——他的著作是以彼此独立的论著形式传世的。有效的出处是论著标题加段落编号。真正要紧的那一点值得再说一遍:这个斐洛之所以传到我们手里,是因为基督徒抄写了他,而不是靠拉比传统——后者几乎不引用他。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
The Greeks celebrate Anaxagoras and Democritus, because they, being smitten with a desire for philosophy, allowed all their estates to be devoured by cattle. I myself admire the men who thus showed themselves superior to the attractions of money ; but how much better were those who have not permitted cattle to devour their possessions, but have supplied the necessities of mankind, of their own relations and friends, and have made them rich though they were poor before ? For surely that was inconsiderate conduct (that I may avoid saying that any action of men whom Greece has agreed to admire was a piece of insanity) ; but this is the act of sober men, and one which has been carefully elaborated by exceeding prudence. For what more can enemies do than ravage, and destroy, and cut down all the trees in the country of their antagonists, that they may be forced to submit by reason of the extent to which they are oppressed by want of necessaries ? And yet Democritus did this to his own blood relations, inflicting artificial want and penury upon them, not perhaps from any hostile intention towards them, but because he did not foresee and provide for what was advantageous to others. How much better and more admirable are they who, without having any inferior eagerness for the attainment of philosophy, have nevertheless preferred magnanimity to carelessness, and, giving presents from their possessions instead of destroying them, so as to be able to benefit others and themselves also, have made others happy by imparting to them of the abundance of their wealth, and themselves by the study of philosophy ? For an undue care for money and wealth causes great waste ON A CONTEMPLATIVE LIFE.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回亚历山大的斐洛