SigPhiSigPhi

苏格拉底的申辩、克里托篇与斐多篇

柏拉图

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 51,200 词 · 243 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA柏拉图. (n.d.). Apology, Crito, and Phaedo of Socrates [苏格拉底的申辩、克里托篇与斐多篇]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/plato/apology-crito-and-phaedo-of-socrates
  • MLA柏拉图. Apology, Crito, and Phaedo of Socrates [苏格拉底的申辩、克里托篇与斐多篇]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/plato/apology-crito-and-phaedo-of-socrates.
  • Chicago柏拉图. Apology, Crito, and Phaedo of Socrates [苏格拉底的申辩、克里托篇与斐多篇]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/plato/apology-crito-and-phaedo-of-socrates.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

苏格拉底之死的三篇对话合于一册:法庭上的申辩、狱中关于为何不逃走的对话,以及饮下毒堇的最后一天。

背景与流传

雅典,公元前399年:苏格拉底的受审、囚禁与处决,柏拉图分三篇写来,传统上连读如同一出戏的三幕。《申辩》是法庭上的自辩;《克力同》说明逃走轻而易举时为何不逃——与城邦法律的契约;《斐多》是关于灵魂的最后长谈与黄昏时分的从容赴死。三篇合起来构成西方哲学的奠基叙事:一个按其所思而生、按其所思而死的哲学家。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选
_Socr._ You say well, by Juno! and have found a great abundance of those that confer benefit. But what further? Can these hearers make them better, or not? _Mel._ They, too, can. _Socr._ And what of the senators? _Mel._ The senators, also. _Socr._ But, Melitus, do those who attend the public assemblies corrupt the younger men? or do they all make them better? _Mel._ They too. _Socr._ All the Athenians, therefore, as it seems, make them honorable and good, except me; but I alone corrupt them. Do you say so? _Mel._ I do assert this very thing. _Socr._ You charge me with great ill-fortune. But answer me: does it appear to you to be the same, with respect to horses? Do all men make them better, and is there only some one that spoils them? or does quite the contrary of this take place? Is there some one person who can make them better, or very few; that is, the trainers? But if the generality of men should meddle with and make use of horses, do they spoil them? Is not this the case, Melitus, both with respect to horses and all other animals? It certainly is so, whether you and Anytus deny it or not. For it would be a great good-fortune for the youth if only one person corrupted, and the rest benefited them. However, Melitus, you have sufficiently shown that you never bestowed any care upon youth; and you clearly evince your own negligence, in that you have never paid any attention to the things with respect to which you accuse me. 13. Tell us further, Melitus, in the name of Jupiter, whether is it better to dwell with good or bad citizens? Answer, my friend; for I ask you nothing difficult. Do not the bad work some evil to those that are continually near them, but the good some good? _Mel._ Certainly. _Socr._ Is there any one that wishes to be injured rather than benefited by his associates? Answer, good man; for the law requires you to answer. Is there any one who wishes to be injured? _Mel._ No, surely. _Socr.…

阅读此版本 →

← 返回柏拉图