叔本华随笔集
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 76,400 词 · 363 个段落
引用本作品
- APA阿图尔·叔本华. (n.d.). 叔本华随笔集. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer
- MLA阿图尔·叔本华. "叔本华随笔集." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer.
- Chicago阿图尔·叔本华. 叔本华随笔集. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer.
内容简介
叔本华随笔英文选:论女人、论噪音、论教育、论自杀、论文体。
背景与流传
作为随笔家的叔本华比《作为意志的世界》里那个体系家更锋利,也好读得多。 关于版本的说明:《Essays of Schopenhauer》并不是叔本华用这个书名写过的一本书。它是英文编者从《附录与补遗》(1851)中挑出来的若干章,书名也是编者自己取的。文本是叔本华的;书不是。 这是一个旧英译本,属公共领域。德文原本目录中也有,引用应以那个为准。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
SHORT DIALOGUE ON THE INDESTRUCTIBILITY OF OUR TRUE BEING BY DEATH RELIGION--A DIALOGUE PSYCHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS METAPHYSICS OF LOVE PHYSIOGNOMY ON SUICIDE PRELIMINARY. When Schopenhauer was asked where he wished to be buried, he answered, "Anywhere; they will find me;" and the stone that marks his grave at Frankfort bears merely the inscription "Arthur Schopenhauer," without even the date of his birth or death. Schopenhauer, the pessimist, had a sufficiently optimistic conviction that his message to the world would ultimately be listened to--a conviction that never failed him during a lifetime of disappointments, of neglect in quarters where perhaps he would have most cherished appreciation; a conviction that only showed some signs of being justified a few years before his death. Schopenhauer was no opportunist; he was not even conciliatory; he never hesitated to declare his own faith in himself, in his principles, in his philosophy; he did not ask to be listened to as a matter of courtesy but as a right--a right for which he would struggle, for which he fought, and which has in the course of time, it may be admitted, been conceded to him. Although everything that Schopenhauer wrote was written more or less as evidence to support his main philosophical thesis, his unifying philosophical principle, the essays in this volume have an interest, if not altogether apart, at least of a sufficiently independent interest to enable them to be considered on their own merits, without relation to his main idea. And in dissociating them, if one may do so for a moment (their author would have scarcely permitted it!…