阿图尔·叔本华随笔集:文学的艺术
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 34,900 词 · 166 个段落
引用本作品
- APA阿图尔·叔本华. (n.d.). The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; The Art of Literature [阿图尔·叔本华随笔集:文学的艺术]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature
- MLA阿图尔·叔本华. The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; The Art of Literature [阿图尔·叔本华随笔集:文学的艺术]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature.
- Chicago阿图尔·叔本华. The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; The Art of Literature [阿图尔·叔本华随笔集:文学的艺术]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature.
这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。
内容简介
论写作与阅读:文体、作者、批评,以及读得太多为什么有害。
背景与流传
「我们读书的时候,是别人在替我们思想。」论文体那一篇至今仍是任何语言里写得最好的之一,而对大学哲学家的那通痛骂也还刺人。 关于版本的说明:《Essays of Schopenhauer》并不是叔本华用这个书名写过的一本书。它是英文编者从《附录与补遗》(1851)中挑出来的若干章,书名也是编者自己取的。文本是叔本华的;书不是。 这是一个旧英译本,属公共领域。德文原本目录中也有,引用应以那个为准。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
case an improvement on what was written before; and that change always means progress. Real thinkers, men of right judgment, people who are in earnest with their subject,--these are all exceptions only. Vermin is the rule everywhere in the world: it is always on the alert, taking the mature opinions of the thinkers, and industriously seeking to improve upon them (save the mark!) in its own peculiar way. If the reader wishes to study any subject, let him beware of rushing to the newest books upon it, and confining his attention to them alone, under the notion that science is always advancing, and that the old books have been drawn upon in the writing of the new. They have been drawn upon, it is true; but how? The writer of the new book often does not understand the old books thoroughly, and yet he is unwilling to take their exact words; so he bungles them, and says in his own bad way that which has been said very much better and more clearly by the old writers, who wrote from their own lively knowledge of the subject. The new writer frequently omits the best things they say, their most striking illustrations, their happiest remarks; because he does not see their value or feel how pregnant they are. The only thing that appeals to him is what is shallow and insipid. It often happens that an old and excellent book is ousted by new and bad ones, which, written for money, appear with an air of great pretension and much puffing on the part of friends. In science a man tries to make his mark by bringing out something fresh. This often means nothing more than that he attacks some received theory which is quite correct, in order to make room for his own false notions. Sometimes the effort is successful for a time; and then a return is made to the old and true theory. These innovators are serious about nothing but their own precious self: it is this that they want to put forward, and the quick way of doing so, as they think, is to start a paradox.…