SigPhiSigPhi

De Cive

托马斯·霍布斯

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 2,530 词 · 12 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA托马斯·霍布斯. (n.d.). De Cive. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive
  • MLA托马斯·霍布斯. De Cive. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive.
  • Chicago托马斯·霍布斯. De Cive. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

《论公民》(1642年):霍布斯的政治理论,比《利维坦》早十年。

背景与流传

在巴黎流亡期间用拉丁文写成,其时英格兰正滑向内战。自然状态、一切人对一切人的战争,以及终结它的那份契约,这里都已经有了。这一条是英译本;拉丁文本不在目录中。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选
duty, I know not what could have been added by humane Industry to the completion of that happinesse, which is consistent with humane life. For were the nature of humane Actions as distinctly knowne, as the nature of Quantity in Geometricall Figures, the strength of Avarice and Ambition, which is sustained by the erroneous opinions of the Vulgar, as touching the nature of Right and Wrong, would presently faint and languish; And Mankinde should enjoy such an Immortall peace, that (unlesse it were for habitation, on supposition that the Earth should grow too narrow for her Inhabitants) there would hardly be left any pretence for war. But now on the contrary, that neither the Sword nor the pen should be allowed any Cessation; That the knowledge of the Law of Nature should lose its growth, not advancing a whit beyond its antient stature; that there should still be such siding with the severall factions of philosophers, that the very same Action should bee decryed by some, and as much elevated by others; that the very same man should at severall times embrace his severall opinions, and esteem his own Actions farre otherwise in himselfe then he does in others; These I say are so many signes, so many manifest Arguments, that what hath hitherto been written by Morall philosophers, hath not made any progress in the knowledge of the Truth; but yet have took with the world, not so much by giving any light to the understanding, as entertainment to the Affections, whilest by the successefull Rhetorications of their speech they have confirmed them in their rashly received opinions. So that this part of philosophy hath suffered the same destiny with the publick Wayes, which lye open to all passengers to traverse up and down or the same lot with high wayes and open streets; Some for divertisement, and some for businesse; so that what with the Impertinencies of some, and the Altercations of others, those wayes have never a seeds time, and therefore yield never a harvest.…

阅读此版本 →

← 返回托马斯·霍布斯